Merchant Asad, Wald Ron, Goldstein Marc B, Yuen Darren, Kirpalani Anish, Dacouris Niki, Ray Joel G, Kiaii Mercedeh, Leipsic Jonathan, Kotha Vamshi, Deva Djeven, Yan Andrew T
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 Apr;9(4):275-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
Hypertension is prevalent in patients with end-stage renal disease and is strongly associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Blood pressure (BP) monitoring in hemodialysis patients may be unreliable because of its lability and variability. We compared different methods of BP measurement and their relationship with LVH on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Sixty patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis at a single dialysis center had BP recorded at each dialysis session over 12 weeks: pre-dialysis, initial dialysis, nadir during dialysis, and post-dialysis. Forty-five of these patients also underwent 44-hour inter-dialytic ambulatory BP monitoring. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and the presence of LVH was ascertained. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated for each BP measurement for predicting LVH. The mean LVMI was 68 g/m(2) (SD = 15 g/m(2)); 13/60 patients (22%) had LVH. Mean arterial pressure measured shortly after initiation of dialysis session was most strongly correlated with LVMI (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.59, P < .0001). LVH was best predicted by post-dialysis systolic BP (area under the curve, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.94) and initial dialysis systolic BP (area under the curve, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.92). Forty-four-hour ambulatory BP and BP variability did not significantly predict LVH. Initial dialysis mean arterial pressure and systolic BP and post-dialysis systolic BP are the strongest predictors of LVH, and may represent the potentially best treatment targets in hemodialysis patients to prevent end-organ damage. Further studies are needed to confirm whether treatment targeting these BP measurements can optimize cardiovascular outcomes.
高血压在终末期肾病患者中很常见,并且与左心室肥厚(LVH)密切相关,左心室肥厚是心血管死亡率的独立预测因素。由于血液透析患者血压的不稳定性和变异性,血压(BP)监测可能不可靠。我们比较了不同的血压测量方法及其与心脏磁共振成像上左心室肥厚的关系。在一个透析中心接受慢性血液透析的60例患者在12周内的每次透析过程中记录血压:透析前、透析开始时、透析过程中的最低点以及透析后。其中45例患者还进行了44小时的透析间期动态血压监测。使用心脏磁共振成像测量左心室质量指数(LVMI)并确定左心室肥厚的存在。为每种血压测量生成预测左心室肥厚的受试者工作特征曲线。平均LVMI为68 g/m²(标准差 = 15 g/m²);13/60例患者(22%)有左心室肥厚。透析开始后不久测量的平均动脉压与LVMI的相关性最强(Pearson相关系数r = 0.59,P <.0001)。透析后收缩压(曲线下面积,0.83;95%置信区间,0.72 - 0.94)和透析开始时收缩压(曲线下面积,0.81;95%置信区间,0.70 - 0.92)对左心室肥厚的预测效果最佳。44小时动态血压和血压变异性对左心室肥厚的预测无显著意义。透析开始时平均动脉压和收缩压以及透析后收缩压是左心室肥厚的最强预测因素,可能代表血液透析患者预防终末器官损害的潜在最佳治疗靶点。需要进一步研究以确认针对这些血压测量值进行治疗是否可优化心血管结局。