Wood Thomas J, Holland John M, Hughes William O H, Goulson Dave
School of Life Sciences, The University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, BN1 9QG, UK.
Mol Ecol. 2015 Apr;24(8):1668-80. doi: 10.1111/mec.13144. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Changes in agricultural practice across Europe and North America have been associated with range contractions and local extinction of bumblebees (Bombus spp.). A number of agri-environment schemes have been implemented to halt and reverse these declines, predominantly revolving around the provision of additional forage plants. Although it has been demonstrated that these schemes can attract substantial numbers of foraging bumblebees, it remains unclear to what extent they actually increase bumblebee populations. We used standardized transect walks and molecular techniques to compare the size of bumblebee populations between Higher Level Stewardship (HLS) farms implementing pollinator-friendly schemes and Entry Level Stewardship (ELS) control farms. Bumblebee abundance on the transect walks was significantly higher on HLS farms than ELS farms. Molecular analysis suggested maximum foraging ranges of 566 m for Bombus hortorum, 714 m for B. lapidarius, 363 m for B. pascuorum and 799 m for B. terrestris. Substantial differences in maximum foraging range were found within bumblebee species between farm types. Accounting for foraging range differences, B. hortorum (47 vs 13 nests/km(2) ) and B. lapidarius (45 vs 22 nests/km(2) ) were found to nest at significantly greater densities on HLS farms than ELS farms. There were no significant differences between farm type for B. terrestris (88 vs 38 nests/km(2) ) and B. pascuorum (32 vs 39 nests/km(2) ). Across all bumblebee species, HLS management had a significantly positive effect on bumblebee nest density. These results show that targeted agri-environment schemes that increase the availability of suitable forage can significantly increase the size of wild bumblebee populations.
欧洲和北美的农业实践变化与熊蜂(熊蜂属)的分布范围收缩和局部灭绝有关。已经实施了一些农业环境计划来阻止和扭转这些衰退,主要围绕提供额外的饲料植物。尽管已经证明这些计划可以吸引大量觅食的熊蜂,但它们实际上在多大程度上增加了熊蜂种群数量仍不清楚。我们使用标准化样带行走和分子技术,比较了实施授粉者友好计划的高级管理(HLS)农场和入门级管理(ELS)对照农场之间熊蜂种群的规模。HLS农场样带行走中的熊蜂丰度明显高于ELS农场。分子分析表明,短舌熊蜂的最大觅食范围为566米,明亮熊蜂为714米,草地熊蜂为363米,地熊蜂为799米。在不同农场类型的熊蜂物种中,发现最大觅食范围存在显著差异。考虑到觅食范围差异,发现短舌熊蜂(每平方公里47个巢对13个巢)和明亮熊蜂(每平方公里45个巢对22个巢)在HLS农场筑巢的密度明显高于ELS农场。地熊蜂(每平方公里88个巢对38个巢)和草地熊蜂(每平方公里32个巢对39个巢)在农场类型之间没有显著差异。在所有熊蜂物种中,HLS管理对熊蜂巢密度有显著的积极影响。这些结果表明,增加合适饲料可用性的针对性农业环境计划可以显著增加野生熊蜂种群的规模。