Suppr超能文献

邮政健康调查能否捕捉65岁及以上受访者的发病率和死亡率?一项基于登记册的验证研究。

Do postal health surveys capture morbidity and mortality in respondents aged 65 years and older? A register-based validation study.

作者信息

Kelfve Susanne, Lennartsson Carin, Agahi Neda, Modig Karin

机构信息

Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Sweden Department of Sociology, Stockholm University, Sweden

Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2015 Jun;43(4):348-55. doi: 10.1177/1403494815575340. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

Abstract

AIMS

Non-response to population surveys is a common problem in epidemiological and public health research. Systematic non-response threatens the validity of results. Researchers rarely evaluate the magnitude of systematic non-response because of limited access to population data. This study explores how well morbidity and mortality in postal survey respondents aged 65 years and older represented that of the target population.

METHODS

The 2010 Stockholm Public Health Survey and the Swedish Population Register were linked to the Cause of Death Register and the National Patient Register in Sweden. Differences were analysed between the response group and the corresponding population in mortality, hospital admission, days spent in hospital and number of diagnoses. Finally, data were weighted for non-response to see if this improved generalizability.

RESULTS

Non-response increased with age, and this increase was more pronounced among women than men. Respondents were marginally less often admitted to hospital, hospitalized fewer days and had slightly fewer diagnoses than the population, in particular after age 80. Significantly fewer women died in the response group than in the population as a whole. In terms of mortality among men and in terms of hospitalizations for most age groups, the respondents represented the population fairly well. Non-response weighting adjustment did not improve generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Postal questionnaires are likely to capture morbidity (hospitalization) among women and men aged 65-80 years old and mortality among men, while morbidity after age 80 and mortality in women are likely to be underestimated.

摘要

目的

在流行病学和公共卫生研究中,人口调查无应答是一个常见问题。系统性无应答会威胁研究结果的有效性。由于获取人口数据的机会有限,研究人员很少评估系统性无应答的程度。本研究探讨了65岁及以上邮政调查受访者的发病率和死亡率在多大程度上代表了目标人群的发病率和死亡率。

方法

将2010年斯德哥尔摩公共卫生调查以及瑞典人口登记册与瑞典死因登记册和国家患者登记册相链接。分析了应答组与相应人群在死亡率、住院情况、住院天数和诊断数量方面的差异。最后,对无应答数据进行加权,以观察这是否能提高普遍性。

结果

无应答率随年龄增长而上升,且女性的上升幅度比男性更为明显。受访者住院的频率略低于总体人群,住院天数更少,诊断数量也略少,特别是在80岁以后。应答组中女性死亡人数明显少于总体人群。就男性死亡率和大多数年龄组的住院情况而言,受访者能较好地代表总体人群。无应答加权调整并未提高普遍性。

结论

邮政问卷可能能够反映65至80岁男性和女性的发病率(住院情况)以及男性的死亡率,而80岁以后女性的发病率和死亡率可能被低估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验