Suppr超能文献

使用Multistix 10 SG白细胞酯酶试纸条检测在自发性细菌性腹膜炎快速床边诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性研究

Multistix 10 SG Leukocyte Esterage Dipstick Testing in Rapid Bedside Diagnosis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Prospective Study.

作者信息

Jha Ashish K, Kumawat Dal C, Bolya Yasvant K, Goenka Mahesh K

机构信息

Institute of Gastro Sciences, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58 CC Road, Kolkata, India.

Department of Medicine, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, Udaipur, India.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2012 Sep;2(3):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) requires rapid diagnosis and the initiation of antibiotics. Diagnosis of SBP is usually based on cytobacteriological examination of ascitic fluid. These tests require good laboratory facilities and reporting time of few hours to 1-2 day. However, the 24 h laboratory facilities not widely available in country like India. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of reagent strip (Multistix 10 SG(®)) for rapid diagnosis of SBP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was prospectively carried out on patients of cirrhosis with ascites. Bedside leukocyte esterase reagent strip testing was performed on ascitic fluid. Cell count as determined by colorimetric scale of reagent strip was compared with counting chamber method. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated.

RESULT

Out of 100 patients with cirrhotic ascites, [72 males: 28 female; mean age 44.34 (SD 13.03) years] 18 patients were diagnosed to have SBP by counting chamber method as compared to 14 patients detected to have SBP by reagent strip test ≥++ positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of reagent strip ≥++ positive were 77.77%, 95.12%, 77.77%, 95.12% and 92% respectively compared to counting chamber method.

CONCLUSION

Reagent strip to diagnose SBP is very specific but less sensitive as compared to counting chamber method. This can be performed rapidly, easily and efficiently even in remote area of developing countries. This bedside test could be a useful tool for the diagnosis of SBP in country like India.

摘要

背景与目的

自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)需要快速诊断并开始使用抗生素。SBP的诊断通常基于腹水的细胞细菌学检查。这些检查需要良好的实验室设施,报告时间为几小时至1 - 2天。然而,像印度这样的国家,24小时实验室设施并不广泛可用。我们评估了试剂条(Multistix 10 SG(®))对SBP快速诊断的效用。

材料与方法

对肝硬化腹水患者进行前瞻性研究。对腹水进行床旁白细胞酯酶试剂条检测。将试剂条比色法测定的细胞计数与计数室法进行比较。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。

结果

在100例肝硬化腹水患者中(72例男性,28例女性;平均年龄44.34岁(标准差13.03)),计数室法诊断出18例SBP患者,而试剂条检测≥++阳性诊断出14例SBP患者。与计数室法相比,试剂条≥++阳性的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为77.77%、95.12%、77.77%、95.12%和92%。

结论

与计数室法相比,用于诊断SBP的试剂条特异性很高,但敏感性较低。即使在发展中国家的偏远地区,也可以快速、轻松且高效地进行此项检测。这种床旁检测可能是印度等国家诊断SBP的有用工具。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验