Farhan Hesso
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Biotechnology Institute Thurgau, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.
Biol Cell. 2015 Jul;107(7):205-17. doi: 10.1111/boc.201400065. Epub 2015 May 6.
Several RNAi screens were performed in search for regulators of the secretory pathway. These screens were performed in different organisms and cell lines and relied on different readouts. Therefore, they have only little overlap among their hits, leading to the question of what we have learned from this approach so far and how these screens contributed towards an integrative understanding of the endomembrane system. The aim of this review is to revisit these screens and discuss their strengths and weaknesses as well as potential reasons for their failure to overlap with each other. As with secretory trafficking, RNAi screens were also performed on other cellular processes such as cell migration and autophagy, both of which were shown to be intimately linked to secretion. Another aim of this review is to compare the outcome of the RNAi screens on secretion, autophagy and cell migration and ask whether the functional genomic approaches have uncovered potential mechanistic insights into the links between these processes.
为了寻找分泌途径的调节因子,进行了多项RNA干扰筛选。这些筛选在不同的生物体和细胞系中进行,并依赖于不同的读数。因此,它们的命中结果只有很少的重叠,这就引发了一个问题:到目前为止我们从这种方法中学到了什么,以及这些筛选如何有助于对内质网系统进行综合理解。这篇综述的目的是重新审视这些筛选,讨论它们的优点和缺点以及它们彼此未能重叠的潜在原因。与分泌运输一样,RNA干扰筛选也在其他细胞过程中进行,如细胞迁移和自噬,这两者都被证明与分泌密切相关。这篇综述的另一个目的是比较RNA干扰筛选在分泌、自噬和细胞迁移方面的结果,并询问功能基因组学方法是否揭示了这些过程之间联系的潜在机制见解。