Suppr超能文献

因专科护理而转诊的男性大便失禁:一项横断面研究。

Faecal incontinence in men referred for specialty care: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Cohan J N, Chou A B, Varma M G

机构信息

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;17(9):802-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12943.

Abstract

AIM

Little is known about men with faecal incontinence. We compared clinical findings and quality of life in a large cohort of men and women with faecal incontinence to guide its evaluation and treatment in men.

METHOD

We analysed men and women presenting to a tertiary referral centre with faecal incontinence between 2005 and 2013. Demographics, physical examination, anorectal physiology testing, symptom severity (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index) and quality of life (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale) were recorded. We determined differences between men and women and analysed the association between gender and quality of life.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 144 men and 897 women. Men with faecal incontinence were slightly younger than women (55.3 vs 57.6 years, P = 0.001), more likely to report coexisting constipation (P = 0.004) and more likely to have normal internal and external sphincter function on physical examination (both P < 0.001). Anorectal physiology testing revealed fewer sphincter defects (P < 0.05) and less pudendal neuropathy (P < 0.05) in men compared with women. Although symptom severity and overall quality of life were similar, men had improved coping and less embarrassment compared with women after we adjusted for important clinical factors.

CONCLUSION

Men with faecal incontinence presenting to a tertiary referral centre are more likely than women to have a mixed presentation characterized by constipation and less sphincter dysfunction. They exhibited better coping and less embarrassment than women. These findings should be taken into consideration when evaluating and treating men with faecal incontinence.

摘要

目的

人们对大便失禁男性的了解甚少。我们比较了一大群大便失禁男性和女性的临床发现及生活质量,以指导对男性大便失禁的评估和治疗。

方法

我们分析了2005年至2013年间到一家三级转诊中心就诊的大便失禁男性和女性。记录了人口统计学资料、体格检查、肛肠生理学测试、症状严重程度(大便失禁严重程度指数)和生活质量(大便失禁生活质量量表)。我们确定了男性和女性之间的差异,并分析了性别与生活质量之间的关联。

结果

数据来自144名男性和897名女性。大便失禁男性比女性略年轻(55.3岁对57.6岁,P = 0.001),更有可能报告同时存在便秘(P = 0.004),并且在体格检查时更有可能内外括约肌功能正常(P均<0.001)。肛肠生理学测试显示,与女性相比,男性的括约肌缺陷较少(P < 0.05),阴部神经病变较少(P < 0.05)。尽管症状严重程度和总体生活质量相似,但在我们对重要临床因素进行调整后,男性与女性相比应对能力有所提高,尴尬程度较低。

结论

到三级转诊中心就诊的大便失禁男性比女性更有可能出现以便秘和较少括约肌功能障碍为特征的混合表现。他们比女性表现出更好的应对能力和更少的尴尬。在评估和治疗大便失禁男性时应考虑这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验