Balconi Michela, Cotelli Maria, Brambilla Michela, Manenti Rosa, Cosseddu Maura, Premi Enrico, Gasparotti Roberto, Zanetti Orazio, Padovani Alessandro, Borroni Barbara
Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Catholic University, Milan, Italy.
Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;46(1):211-25. doi: 10.3233/JAD-142826.
Previous studies have reported significant deficits in emotion recognition among individuals along the frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum. The basis of emotional impairment is still poorly understood and explicit (emotion appraisal) and implicit (autonomic system activity) responses have not been carefully evaluated.
We investigated explicit evaluation of emotions by testing valence and arousal using self-report measures and we also assessed automatic responses to emotional cues, using autonomic measures (skin conductance response and heart rate).
16 behavioral variant FTD and 12 agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia patients were included. The performance of these patients was compared to a group of 14 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 20 healthy controls. Each subject was required to observe and evaluate affective pictures while autonomic parameters were recorded.
FTD patients preserved a functional general competency in terms of valence (correct positive versus negative attribution) and arousal (correct dichotomy between high versus low arousal category) distinction. These patients showed significant changes in autonomic implicit response compared to the other groups. The mismatch between explicit and implicit responsiveness to emotional cues was found both in behavioral variant FTD and in agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia. Emotional responsiveness was related to the severity of behavioral abnormalities as measured by the Frontal Behavioral Inventory and associated with atrophy of the left putamen.
The present findings indicate that FTD patients are able to explicitly "appraise" the emotion, but they cannot implicitly "feel" the emotion. This mismatch between the two levels may help explain the general emotional behavior impairment found in these patients.
先前的研究报告称,额颞叶痴呆(FTD)谱系中的个体在情绪识别方面存在显著缺陷。情绪障碍的基础仍知之甚少,明确(情绪评估)和隐含(自主神经系统活动)反应尚未得到仔细评估。
我们通过使用自我报告测量法测试效价和唤醒水平来研究对情绪的明确评估,并且我们还使用自主测量法(皮肤电传导反应和心率)评估对情绪线索的自动反应。
纳入16例行为变异型FTD患者和12例原发性进行性失语的语法缺失型患者。将这些患者的表现与一组14例阿尔茨海默病患者和20名健康对照者进行比较。要求每个受试者观察和评估情感图片,同时记录自主参数。
FTD患者在效价(正确的积极与消极归因)和唤醒水平(高唤醒与低唤醒类别之间的正确二分法)区分方面保持了功能性的一般能力。与其他组相比,这些患者的自主隐含反应有显著变化。在行为变异型FTD和原发性进行性失语的语法缺失型中均发现了对情绪线索的明确和隐含反应之间的不匹配。情绪反应性与额叶行为量表测量的行为异常严重程度相关,并与左侧壳核萎缩有关。
目前的研究结果表明,FTD患者能够明确地“评估”情绪,但他们无法隐含地“感受”情绪。这两个层面之间的不匹配可能有助于解释这些患者中发现的一般情绪行为障碍。