Eisenberg Dan T A, Kuzawa Christopher W, Hayes M Geoffrey
Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Am J Hum Biol. 2015 Jul-Aug;27(4):570-5. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22690. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Telomere length (TL) is commonly measured using quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although, easier than the southern blot of terminal restriction fragments (TRF) TL measurement method, one drawback of qPCR is that it introduces greater measurement error and thus reduces the statistical power of analyses. To address a potential source of measurement error, we consider the effect of well position on qPCR TL measurements.
qPCR TL data from 3,638 people run on a Bio-Rad iCycler iQ are reanalyzed here. To evaluate measurement validity, correspondence with TRF, age, and between mother and offspring are examined.
First, we present evidence for systematic variation in qPCR TL measurements in relation to thermocycler well position. Controlling for these well-position effects consistently improves measurement validity and yields estimated improvements in statistical power equivalent to increasing sample sizes by 16%. We additionally evaluated the linearity of the relationships between telomere and single copy gene control amplicons and between qPCR and TRF measures. We find that, unlike some previous reports, our data exhibit linear relationships. We introduce the standard error in percent, a superior method for quantifying measurement error as compared to the commonly used coefficient of variation. Using this measure, we find that excluding samples with high measurement error does not improve measurement validity in our study.
Future studies using block-based thermocyclers should consider well position effects. Since additional information can be gleaned from well position corrections, rerunning analyses of previous results with well position correction could serve as an independent test of the validity of these results.
端粒长度(TL)通常采用定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)进行测量。尽管qPCR比端粒限制性片段(TRF)的Southern印迹法测量TL的方法更简便,但qPCR的一个缺点是它会引入更大的测量误差,从而降低分析的统计效力。为了解决测量误差的一个潜在来源,我们考虑了孔位置对qPCR TL测量的影响。
本文重新分析了在Bio-Rad iCycler iQ上运行的3638人的qPCR TL数据。为了评估测量有效性,检查了与TRF、年龄以及母婴之间的对应关系。
首先,我们提供了qPCR TL测量值与热循环仪孔位置相关的系统变异的证据。控制这些孔位置效应可持续提高测量有效性,并产生相当于样本量增加16%的统计效力估计改善。我们还评估了端粒与单拷贝基因对照扩增子之间以及qPCR与TRF测量之间关系的线性。我们发现,与一些先前的报告不同,我们的数据呈现线性关系。我们引入了百分比标准误差,这是一种比常用变异系数更优越的量化测量误差的方法。使用这种方法,我们发现在我们的研究中排除具有高测量误差的样本并不能提高测量有效性。
未来使用基于模块的热循环仪的研究应考虑孔位置效应。由于可以从孔位置校正中收集额外信息,对先前结果进行孔位置校正后重新运行分析可作为这些结果有效性的独立检验。