• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无缝合人工瓣膜与微创主动脉瓣置换术:仅仅是夹闭时间的问题吗?

Sutureless prostheses and less invasive aortic valve replacement: just an issue of clamping time?

作者信息

Vola Marco, Campisi Salvatore, Gerbay Antoine, Fuzellier Jean-François, Ayari Iness, Favre Jean-Pierre, Faure Michael, Morel Jerôme, Anselmi Amedeo

机构信息

Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital St-Etienne, St-Priest en Jarez, France.

Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital St-Etienne, St-Priest en Jarez, France.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 May;99(5):1518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.072. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.072
PMID:25757759
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, sutureless aortic bioprostheses have been increasingly adopted to facilitate minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. We aimed at evaluating the impact of the transition from conventional bioprostheses to the routine use of the 3f Enable prosthesis (Medtronic ATS Medical, Minneapolis, MN) for aortic valve replacement through ministernotomy.

METHODS

Between November 2009 and November 2012, 83 consecutive minimally invasive aortic valve replacement procedures were performed in our institution by the same surgeon through an upper T-shaped ministernotomy. The earliest 42 patients (group A) received a conventional bioprosthesis, and the later 41 patients (group B) received the sutureless 3f Enable valve. Aortic clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times, early outcomes, and valve hemodynamics were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistical intergroup difference in baseline characteristics. In-hospital mortality was 1% (a single nonvalve-related death). Average aortic clamping times in group A and group B were, respectively, 85 ± 17 and 47 ± 11 minutes (p < 0.0001); the cardiopulmonary bypass time was 108 ± 21 and 69 ± 15 minutes, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were three paravalvular leakages in group A (grade I) and four in group B (two grade I, and two grade II); three pacemaker implantations occurred in group B (p = 0.07); mean transvalvular gradient at discharge was 16.9 ± 9.1 mm Hg in group A and 11.4 ± 4.3 mm Hg in group B (p = 0.0007). During follow-up (average 25.5 ± 12.9 months), one structural valve deterioration was registered in group A, and was treated with a valve-in-valve procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In our initial experience, the sutureless 3f Enable technology significantly reduced the clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times, as well as the mean transvalvular gradient in aortic valve replacement through ministernotomy.

摘要

背景

最近,无缝合主动脉生物假体越来越多地被用于促进微创主动脉瓣置换。我们旨在评估通过胸骨上段小切口,从传统生物假体过渡到常规使用3f Enable假体(美敦力ATS医疗公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)进行主动脉瓣置换的影响。

方法

2009年11月至2012年11月期间,我们机构的同一位外科医生通过胸骨上段T形小切口连续进行了83例微创主动脉瓣置换手术。最早的42例患者(A组)接受传统生物假体,后41例患者(B组)接受无缝合3f Enable瓣膜。比较主动脉阻断和体外循环时间、早期结果及瓣膜血流动力学。

结果

两组患者的基线特征无统计学差异。住院死亡率为1%(1例与瓣膜无关的死亡)。A组和B组的平均主动脉阻断时间分别为85±17分钟和47±11分钟(p<0.0001);体外循环时间分别为108±21分钟和69±15分钟(p<0.0001)。A组有3例瓣周漏(I级),B组有4例(2例I级,2例II级);B组有3例植入起搏器(p = 0.07);出院时A组的平均跨瓣压差为16.9±9.1 mmHg,B组为11.4±4.3 mmHg(p = 0.0007)。随访期间(平均25.5±12.9个月),A组有1例发生结构性瓣膜退变,并接受了瓣中瓣手术治疗。

结论

根据我们的初步经验,无缝合3f Enable技术显著缩短了通过胸骨上段小切口进行主动脉瓣置换时的阻断和体外循环时间,以及平均跨瓣压差。

相似文献

1
Sutureless prostheses and less invasive aortic valve replacement: just an issue of clamping time?无缝合人工瓣膜与微创主动脉瓣置换术:仅仅是夹闭时间的问题吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 May;99(5):1518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.072. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
2
Right anterior minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Early outcomes and 1-year follow-up from 2 European centers.右胸前外侧小切口主动脉瓣置换术联合应用无缝线生物瓣:来自欧洲 2 个中心的早期结果和 1 年随访。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1052-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.017. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
3
Sutureless aortic valve implantation through an upper v-type ministernotomy: an innovative approach in high-risk patients.经上 V 型小切口无缝线主动脉瓣植入术:高危患者的创新方法
Innovations (Phila). 2013 Jan-Feb;8(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e31828d6b03.
4
Two alternative sutureless strategies for aortic valve replacement: a two-center experience.主动脉瓣置换的两种替代性无缝合策略:一项两中心经验。
Innovations (Phila). 2013 Jul-Aug;8(4):253-7. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000007.
5
Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.采用带支架生物假体经全胸骨切开术进行主动脉瓣置换与采用无缝合生物假体经微创胸骨切开术进行主动脉瓣置换的对比。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):220-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv014. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
6
Short-term follow up with the 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and echocardiographic results.3f Enable主动脉生物瓣的短期随访:临床及超声心动图结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 2013 Nov;22(6):817-23.
7
Clinical performance of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: five-year results of the 3f Enable long-term follow-up study.无缝合主动脉生物假体的临床性能:3F Enable长期随访研究的五年结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.054. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
8
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval valves: first clinical experience.经心尖二尖瓣置换术(Perceval 瓣膜):初步临床经验。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014 Mar;15(3):230-4. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328360936a.
9
Clinical experience with the second-generation 3f Enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis.第二代 3f Enable 免缝合主动脉瓣假体的临床经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;140(2):313-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.041.
10
Sutureless Valve Implantation via Mini J-Sternotomy: A Single Center Experience with 2 Years Mean Follow-up.经迷你J形胸骨切开术的无缝合瓣膜植入:单中心2年平均随访经验
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;63(6):467-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554043. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Not All SAVR Are Created Equal: All the Approaches Available for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.并非所有的外科主动脉瓣置换术都一样:外科主动脉瓣置换术的所有可用方法。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 24;12(3):84. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030084.
2
Continuous or interrupted pledgeted suture technique in stented bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a comparison of in-hospital outcomes.支架生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术中连续或间断带线缝合技术:院内结局比较。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Apr 4;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02754-3.
3
Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement: Techniques and early results.
全胸腔镜主动脉瓣置换术:技术与早期结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 9;9:1106845. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1106845. eCollection 2022.
4
Rapid deployment technology versus conventional sutured bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换中快速部署技术与传统缝线生物瓣的比较。
J Card Surg. 2022 Mar;37(3):640-655. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16223. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
5
Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.采用带支架或无缝合/快速植入人工瓣膜,经全胸骨切开术或微创入路进行主动脉瓣置换术:一项网状荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep;9(5):347-363. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-17.
6
Continuous Suture Technique for Aortic Valve Replacement Shortens Cross-Clamp and Bypass Times.主动脉瓣置换术的连续缝合技术可缩短主动脉阻断和体外循环时间。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2017 Dec 19;44(6):390-394. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-16-5886. eCollection 2017 Dec.