Suppr超能文献

采用带支架或无缝合/快速植入人工瓣膜,经全胸骨切开术或微创入路进行主动脉瓣置换术:一项网状荟萃分析

Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Woldendorp Kei, Doyle Mathew P, Bannon Paul G, Misfeld Martin, Yan Tristan D, Santarpino Giuseppe, Berretta Paolo, Di Eusanio Marco, Meuris Bart, Cerillo Alfredo Giuseppe, Stefàno Pierluigi, Marchionni Niccolò, Olive Jacqueline K, Nguyen Tom C, Solinas Marco, Bianchi Giacomo

机构信息

Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

The Baird Institute of Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep;9(5):347-363. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New technologies such as sutureless or rapid deployment prosthetic valves and access via minimally invasive incisions offer alternatives to traditional full-sternotomy aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, a comprehensive comparison of these surgical techniques along with alternative valve prosthesis has not been completed.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing outcomes for SAVR, minimally invasive AVR (MiAVR), sutureless/rapid-deployment AVR (SuAVR) via full-sternotomy, or minimally invasive SuAVR (MiSuAVR) from their inception until September 2018. Early postoperative outcomes and follow-up data were included in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with 8,718 patients were identified. Compared with standard SAVR, SuAVR had significantly lower incidence of postoperative AF [odds ratio (OR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.79, P=0.013] and MiSuAVR greater requirement for postoperative permanent pacemaker (OR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.25-4.14, P=0.008). All sutureless/rapid-deployment procedures had reduced cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times, by a mean of 25.9 and 25.0 min, respectively. Hospital length of stay (LOS), but not intensive care LOS, was reduced for all groups (MiAVR -1.53 days, MiSuAVR -2.79 days, and SuAVR 3.37 days). A signal towards reduced early mortality, wound infections, and acute kidney injury was noted in both sutureless/rapid-deployment and minimally invasive techniques but did not achieve significance. Sutureless/rapid-deployment procedures had favourable survival and freedom from valve related reoperation, however follow-up times were short and demonstrated significant heterogeneity between intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive and sutureless techniques demonstrate equivalent early postoperative outcomes to SAVR and may reduce ventilation time, hospital LOS and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) burden.

摘要

背景

诸如无缝合或快速植入的人工瓣膜以及通过微创切口进行手术等新技术为传统正中开胸主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)提供了替代方案。然而,这些手术技术与其他瓣膜假体之间的全面比较尚未完成。

方法

检索电子数据库,查找自开始至2018年9月比较SAVR、微创主动脉瓣置换术(MiAVR)、经正中开胸的无缝合/快速植入主动脉瓣置换术(SuAVR)或微创无缝合主动脉瓣置换术(MiSuAVR)疗效的研究。术后早期结果和随访数据纳入贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

结果

共确定了23项研究,涉及8718例患者。与标准SAVR相比,SuAVR术后房颤发生率显著更低[优势比(OR)0.33,95%置信区间(CI):0.14 - 0.79,P = 0.013],而MiSuAVR术后对永久性起搏器的需求更高(OR 2.27,95% CI:1.25 - 4.14,P = 0.008)。所有无缝合/快速植入手术的体外循环时间和主动脉阻断时间均缩短,平均分别缩短25.9分钟和25.0分钟。所有组的住院时间(LOS)均缩短,但重症监护病房住院时间未缩短(MiAVR - 1.53天,MiSuAVR - 2.79天,SuAVR - 3.37天)。在无缝合/快速植入技术和微创技术中均发现有降低早期死亡率、伤口感染和急性肾损伤的趋势,但未达到显著水平。无缝合/快速植入手术在生存和免于瓣膜相关再次手术方面表现良好,然而随访时间较短,且各干预组之间存在显著异质性。

结论

微创和无缝合技术在术后早期结果方面与SAVR相当,且可能缩短通气时间、住院LOS和术后房颤(POAF)负担。

相似文献

2

引用本文的文献

3
Midterm Outcomes of Right Anterior Mini Thoracotomy Aortic Valve Replacement.右前小切口主动脉瓣置换术的中期结果
CJC Open. 2024 Sep 13;6(12):1484-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.004. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Right Anterior Minithoracotomy Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement.右前小切口开胸入路行主动脉瓣置换术
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Sep-Oct;19(5):494-508. doi: 10.1177/15569845241276876. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

4
Thrombocytopenia after implantation of the Perceval S aortic bioprosthesis.植入 Perceval S 主动脉生物瓣后发生血小板减少症。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jul;160(1):61-68.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.07.046. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验