Kim Hyungjin Myra, Chiang Claire, Weintraub Daniel, Schneider Lon S, Kales Helen
Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;30(12):1238-49. doi: 10.1002/gps.4281. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Prescribing practice patterns and factors associated with treatment changes in older patients initiating antipsychotic treatment for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia is not well known.
The objective of this study is to study 90-day prescribing practice patterns across the three most commonly prescribed antipsychotics.
This is a retrospective study using national data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The study included patients older than 65 years diagnosed with dementia who began outpatient treatment with an antipsychotic medication between 2005 and 2008. Patients were followed for 90 days from their antipsychotic start. The primary event of interest was changing to another psychotropic medication. Cumulative incidence of treatment change was determined with antipsychotic discontinuation and death as competing risks. Covariate-adjusted hazard ratios for treatment change were determined using competing risk regression models.
During the study period, 15,435 patients initiated an atypical antipsychotic; 14,791 started olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. Over half (55%) of the patients discontinued index treatment within 90 days, 36% continued, 3% died while on index treatment, and 6% changed to another psychotropic medication. Compared with quetiapine, the adjusted hazard of treatment change was higher by 43% (p = 0.005) for olanzapine and by 12% (p = 0.08) for risperidone.
The higher hazard of treatment change with olanzapine suggests patients either responded worse to or experienced more adverse events with olanzapine compared with quetiapine.
对于开始使用抗精神病药物治疗痴呆行为和心理症状的老年患者,其处方实践模式以及与治疗变化相关的因素尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是研究三种最常用抗精神病药物的90天处方实践模式。
这是一项使用美国退伍军人事务部(VA)国家数据的回顾性研究。该研究纳入了2005年至2008年间开始使用抗精神病药物进行门诊治疗的65岁以上痴呆患者。患者从开始使用抗精神病药物起被随访90天。主要关注事件是换用另一种精神药物。以抗精神病药物停药和死亡作为竞争风险来确定治疗变化的累积发生率。使用竞争风险回归模型确定治疗变化的协变量调整风险比。
在研究期间,15435名患者开始使用非典型抗精神病药物;14791名患者开始使用奥氮平、喹硫平或利培酮。超过一半(55%)的患者在90天内停用了索引治疗,36%的患者继续使用,3%的患者在接受索引治疗时死亡,6%的患者换用了另一种精神药物。与喹硫平相比,奥氮平治疗变化的调整后风险高43%(p = 0.005),利培酮高12%(p = 0.08)。
奥氮平治疗变化风险较高表明,与喹硫平相比,患者对奥氮平的反应较差或经历了更多不良事件。