University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha, NE.
Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):190-211. doi: 10.3322/caac.21268. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer-related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence-based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self-report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence-based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system-wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence-based recommendations.
关于癌症相关疲劳(疲劳)的证据已经积累得足够充分,以至于最近 4 个主要癌症组织发布了关于筛查、评估和/或管理的建议。这些基于证据的疲劳建议可供临床医生使用,其中一些有患者版本;但是患者、临床医生和系统层面的障碍阻碍了其在实践中的传播和实施。这种使人衰弱的症状的潜在生物学机制尚未完全阐明,阻碍了针对该症状的机制驱动干预措施的发展。然而,在使用可靠和有效的自我报告措施来筛查和全面评估疲劳和其他常见症状方面已经取得了重大进展。虽然有限的数据支持使用任何药物治疗;但是,一些非药物干预措施已被证明可有效减轻成年人的疲劳。以前从未有过 4 个主要癌症组织(美国国家综合癌症网络、肿瘤护理学会、加拿大癌症防治合作组织/加拿大心理社会肿瘤学协会和美国临床肿瘤学会)发布针对疲劳管理的基于证据的建议。临床医生可能会问:我们是否准备好将其付诸实践?答案是:有多种用于筛查、评估和管理的方法已经准备好付诸实践。为了减轻疲劳的严重程度和痛苦,以及其对功能的影响,需要临床医生和研究人员之间加强合作和密切合作,重点是在整个系统中努力传播和实施这些基于证据的建议。