Suppr超能文献

伤口镇痛控制开胸术后疼痛的疗效:一项随机双盲研究†

Efficacy of wound analgesia for controlling post-thoracotomy pain: a randomized double-blind study†.

作者信息

Fiorelli Alfonso, Izzo Anna Cecilia, Frongillo Elisabetta Maria, Del Prete Assunta, Liguori Giovanni, Di Costanzo Emilio, Vicidomini Giovanni, Santini Mario

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery Unit, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Anestesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):339-47. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv097. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetics has been successfully applied for postoperative pain control in several procedures but, surprisingly, it is underused in thoracic surgery. We aimed to investigate the effects of wound analgesia associated with systemic patient-controlled analgesia in patients undergoing lung cancer resection with muscle-sparing thoracotomy.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients undergoing lung cancer resection via standard muscle-sparing thoracotomy were randomized into two groups (wound analgesia and placebo groups). Bupivacaine in the wound group and free-saline solution in the placebo group were injected using a multiholed catheter connected to an elastomeric pump inserted at the end of operation between the pericostal sutures and the serratus muscle and removed 48 h after. The inter-group differences were assessed by the following criteria: (i) level of cytokines [IL-6, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)]; (ii) pain on a visual analogue scale at rest and after coughing; (iii) recovery of respiratory functions (flow expiratory volume in 1 s % and forced vital capacity %) and (iv) narcotic medication consumption at different time points of the postoperative course.

RESULTS

Five out of a total of 60 patients were excluded from the final analysis. Thus, the wound and placebo groups comprised 27 and 28 patients, respectively. The wound group compared with the placebo group had a significant decrease of IL-6 (P < 0.001), IL-10 (P < 0.001) and TNF-alpha (P < 0.001) blood concentration levels, pain scores at rest (P < 0.001) and after coughing (P = 0.01), and a reduction of additional morphine intake (P = 0.03) and Ketorolac (P = 0.01) during the entire postoperative course. The recovery of the flow expiratory volume in one second % (P = 0.01) and the forced vital capacity % (P = 0.02) was also better in the wound than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data prove that wound analgesia is an effective, easy and safe procedure. It significantly reduces systemic inflammatory markers, pain scores and opioid intake; and accelerates the recovery of respiratory function. Catheter placement does not require particular manoeuvres by the surgeon nor does the elastomeric pump need any adjustment or care by physicians or nurses.

摘要

目的

局部麻醉药持续伤口灌注已成功应用于多种手术的术后疼痛控制,但令人惊讶的是,其在胸外科手术中的应用并不广泛。我们旨在研究在接受保留肌肉开胸肺癌切除术的患者中,伤口镇痛联合全身患者自控镇痛的效果。

方法

连续60例接受标准保留肌肉开胸肺癌切除术的患者被随机分为两组(伤口镇痛组和安慰剂组)。伤口组注射布比卡因,安慰剂组注射生理盐水,均通过连接到弹性泵的多孔导管进行注射,弹性泵在手术结束时插入肋骨间缝线与锯肌之间,48小时后取出。通过以下标准评估组间差异:(i)细胞因子水平[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)];(ii)静息和咳嗽后的视觉模拟评分疼痛;(iii)呼吸功能恢复情况(第1秒用力呼气量百分比和用力肺活量百分比);(iv)术后不同时间点的麻醉药物消耗情况。

结果

60例患者中共有5例被排除在最终分析之外。因此,伤口镇痛组和安慰剂组分别包括27例和28例患者。与安慰剂组相比,伤口镇痛组患者血液中IL-6(P < 0.001)、IL-10(P < 0.001)和TNF-α(P < 0.001)的浓度水平显著降低,静息时(P < 0.001)和咳嗽后(P = 0.01)的疼痛评分降低,并且在整个术后过程中额外吗啡摄入量(P = 0.03)和酮咯酸(P = 0.01)减少。伤口镇痛组第1秒用力呼气量百分比(P = 0.01)和用力肺活量百分比(P = 0.02)的恢复情况也优于安慰剂组。

结论

我们的数据证明伤口镇痛是一种有效、简便且安全的方法。它能显著降低全身炎症标志物、疼痛评分和阿片类药物摄入量,并加速呼吸功能的恢复。导管放置不需要外科医生进行特殊操作,弹性泵也不需要医生或护士进行任何调整或护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验