Social and Personality Psychology, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark.
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 13;6:126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00126. eCollection 2015.
It is increasingly recognized that graduates' achievements depend in important ways on their opportunities to develop an academic and a professional identity during their studies. Previous research has shown that students' socio-economic status (SES) and social capital prior to entering university affects their ability to obtain these identities in higher education. However, what is less well understood is whether social capital that is built during university studies shapes identity development, and if so, whether the social capital gained during university years impacts on academic and professional identity differently. In a qualitative study, we interviewed 26 Danish and 11 Australian university students about their social interaction experiences, their opportunities to develop bonding capital as well as bridging capital, and their academic and professional identity. Findings show that while bonding social capital with co-students facilitated academic identity formation, such social capital does not lead to professional identity development. We also found that the development of bridging social capital with educators facilitated students' professional identity formation. However, bonding social capital among students stood in the way of participating in bridging interaction with educators, thereby further hindering professional identity formation. Finally, while students' parental background did not affect the perceived difficulty of forming professional identity, there was a tendency for students from lower SES backgrounds to be more likely to make internal attributions while those from higher SES backgrounds were more likely to make external attributions for the failure to develop professional identity. Results point to the importance of creating opportunities for social interaction with educators at university because this facilitates the generation of bridging social capital, which, in turn, is essential for students' professional identity development.
人们越来越认识到,毕业生的成就在很大程度上取决于他们在学习期间发展学术和专业身份的机会。先前的研究表明,学生进入大学之前的社会经济地位(SES)和社会资本会影响他们在高等教育中获得这些身份的能力。然而,人们不太了解的是,大学期间建立的社会资本是否会影响身份发展,如果是,那么大学期间获得的社会资本是否会对学术和专业身份产生不同的影响。在一项定性研究中,我们采访了 26 名丹麦学生和 11 名澳大利亚学生,了解他们的社交互动经历、建立联系资本和桥接资本的机会,以及他们的学术和专业身份。研究结果表明,虽然与同学的社交资本有助于学术身份的形成,但这种社交资本不会导致专业身份的发展。我们还发现,与教育者建立桥接社会资本有助于学生专业身份的形成。然而,学生之间的联系社会资本阻碍了他们与教育者进行桥接互动,从而进一步阻碍了专业身份的形成。最后,虽然学生的父母背景不会影响形成专业身份的难度,但 SES 较低的学生更倾向于进行内部归因,而 SES 较高的学生更倾向于进行外部归因,认为自己无法形成专业身份。研究结果表明,在大学创造与教育者进行社交互动的机会非常重要,因为这有助于产生桥接社会资本,而桥接社会资本对学生的专业身份发展至关重要。