• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗博士生导师互动问卷(QSDI)心理计量特性评估。

Assessment of psychometric properties of the questionnaire on supervisor-doctoral student interaction (QSDI) in Iran.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Substance Abuse Prevention Research Center, Research Institute for Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 14;21(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02932-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-021-02932-0
PMID:34649529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8515155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the main elements that help students in research projects and composing dissertations is the student-supervisor relationship. A valid and reliable tool to measure this seems essential and it is the objective of the present study to validate and assess the psychometric properties of a questionnaire on supervisor-doctoral student interaction (QSDI) in Iran.

METHODS

Before starting the study, a permission from the developer of the tool was secured. Then the tool was forward-backward translated. After preparing the Farsi version of the tool, content validity was confirmed through qualitative and quantitative methods. To examine construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted with participation of 218 and 410 MD, MSc, and PhD students of medical sciences, respectively. To check reliability of the tool, correlation coefficient was used. To examine internal consistency of the tool, Cronbach's alpha was used. Data analyses were done in SPSS (v.25) and LISREL (v.8).

RESULTS

The EFA and CFA results revealed eight factors and 39 items. The value of R-square for the model was equal to 0.99, which means 99% of changes in the dependent variable (supervisor-student interaction) is attributed to the independent variable (41 items). That is, 99% of the dependent variable changes is due to the independent variables. The main indices of the model based on factor analyses were supported (0.9<), which indicated goodness of fit of the model (χ2/df = 1.76, CFI, NFI, TLI = 0.98 GFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.043, R-square = 0.99). The significance level for correlation coefficient was below 0.05. Reliability of the tool was supported based on internal correlation (Cronbach's alpha) equal to 0.943 for the whole tool and in 0.89-0.97 range for the subscales.

CONCLUSION

In general, the results showed that the Farsi version of QSDI (eight factors and 39 items) had acceptable and applicable indices and it can be used as a valid tool in different fields for higher education students of medical sciences.

摘要

背景

在研究项目和论文撰写中,帮助学生的一个主要因素是师生关系。因此,似乎有必要开发一种有效的、可靠的工具来衡量这一点,这也是本研究的目的,即验证并评估伊朗博士生导师-博士生互动问卷(QSDI)的心理测量特性。

方法

在开始研究之前,从工具的开发者那里获得了许可。然后对工具进行了正向和反向翻译。在准备好工具的波斯语版本后,通过定性和定量方法确认了内容效度。为了检验结构效度,分别对 218 名和 410 名医学博士、理学硕士和博士研究生进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。为了检查工具的可靠性,使用了相关系数。为了检查工具的内部一致性,使用了 Cronbach's alpha。数据分析使用 SPSS(v.25)和 LISREL(v.8)进行。

结果

EFA 和 CFA 结果显示有 8 个因子和 39 个项目。模型的 R-square 值等于 0.99,这意味着因变量(师生互动)的 99%变化归因于自变量(41 个项目)。也就是说,因变量的 99%变化归因于自变量。基于因子分析的模型主要指标得到支持(0.9<),这表明模型拟合度良好(χ2/df = 1.76,CFI、NFI、TLI = 0.98,GFI = 0.91,RMSEA = 0.043,R-square = 0.99)。相关系数的显著性水平低于 0.05。基于内部相关性(Cronbach's alpha),工具的可靠性得到支持,整个工具的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.943,子量表的范围为 0.89-0.97。

结论

总的来说,结果表明,QSDI 的波斯语版本(8 个因子和 39 个项目)具有可接受和适用的指标,可作为医学科学高等教育学生在不同领域的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d6/8515691/d226788ab8b3/12909_2021_2932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d6/8515691/96363da007c6/12909_2021_2932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d6/8515691/d226788ab8b3/12909_2021_2932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d6/8515691/96363da007c6/12909_2021_2932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d6/8515691/d226788ab8b3/12909_2021_2932_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of psychometric properties of the questionnaire on supervisor-doctoral student interaction (QSDI) in Iran.伊朗博士生导师互动问卷(QSDI)心理计量特性评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 14;21(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02932-0.
2
Validation and psychometric properties of the drug users' quality of life scale in Iranian population.验证和心理测量学特性的药物使用者的生活质量量表在伊朗人口。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Jul 22;15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00289-z.
3
Assessment of psychometric properties of the modified experiences of teaching-learning questionnaire in Iranian nursing students.评估改良教学体验问卷在伊朗护理学生中的心理测量特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 25;22(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03365-z.
4
Validation and psychometric properties of the community assessment inventory in Iranian persons who use drug.吸毒人群社区评估量表在伊朗人群中的验证和心理测量特性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Jul 18;15(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00290-6.
5
The validity and reliability properties of a Persian version of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP) questionnaire among Iranian students of health-related fields.一个基于证据的实践概况(EBP)问卷的波斯语版本在伊朗健康相关领域学生中的有效性和可靠性特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06139-x.
6
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Persian version of Evidence Based Medicine Questionnaire (EBMQ) in postgraduate medical students in Iran.伊朗医学研究生的循证医学问卷(EBMQ)波斯语版本的翻译与跨文化调适。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301831. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire in the Iranian Population.荷兰睡眠障碍问卷在伊朗人群中的心理测量学特性评估。
Sleep Disord. 2022 Mar 14;2022:1367067. doi: 10.1155/2022/1367067. eCollection 2022.
8
Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China.中国学生结核病患者(STBP)知识、态度和实践(KAP)问卷的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 8;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9.
9
Reliability and validity study of the Thai adaptation of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (CBI-SS) among preclinical medical students at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.泰国玛希隆大学诗里拉吉医院医学院预科医学生使用哥本哈根倦怠量表学生调查(CBI-SS)的泰语适应性可靠性和有效性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 30;16(12):e0261887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261887. eCollection 2021.
10
Intensive care unit dignified care: Persian translation and psychometric evaluation.重症监护病房的尊严护理:波斯语翻译与心理计量学评估。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jul;11(7):e2238. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2238.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlational study on cyberbullying and social abilities in intercultural teenagers.跨文化青少年网络欺凌与社交能力的相关性研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 29;13:848678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848678. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire in the Iranian Population.荷兰睡眠障碍问卷在伊朗人群中的心理测量学特性评估。
Sleep Disord. 2022 Mar 14;2022:1367067. doi: 10.1155/2022/1367067. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation and initial examination of the psychometric properties of the Short Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SSRQ) for use with general practice registrars.适应和初步检验一般实践住院医师使用的《短监管关系问卷》(SSRQ)的心理计量特性。
Educ Prim Care. 2020 Nov;31(6):341-348. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1806114. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
Adapting the supervisory relationship measure for general medical practice.适应一般医疗实践的监督关系度量。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 27;18(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1369-x.
3
Bridging and bonding interactions in higher education: social capital and students' academic and professional identity formation.
高等教育中的桥梁和纽带关系:社会资本与学生的学术和专业身份形成。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 13;6:126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00126. eCollection 2015.
4
Professional doctorate supervision: exploring student and supervisor experiences.专业博士学位指导:探索学生与导师的经历
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Aug;29(6):641-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
5
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
6
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.患者报告结局(PRO)测量指标翻译与文化调适过程的良好实践原则:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)翻译与文化调适特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.