Hosseinabadi Reza, Jafarzadeh Sadegh
Department of Audiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Dec 24;17(1):e18029. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.18029. eCollection 2015 Jan.
The Auditory steady state response (ASSR) provides a frequency-specific and automatic assessment of hearing sensitivity and is used in infants and difficult-to-test adults.
The aim of this study was to compare the ASSR thresholds among various types (normal, conductive, and sensorineural), degree (normal, mild, and moderate), and configuration (flat and sloping) of hearing sensitivity, and measuring the cutoff point between normal condition and hearing loss for different frequencies.
This clinical trial was performed in Iran and included patients who were referred from Ear, Nose, and Throat Department. A total of 54 adults (27 with sensorineural hearing loss, 17 with conductive hearing losses, and 10 with normal hearing) were randomly chosen to participate in our study. The type and degree of hearing loss were determined through testing by otoscopy, tympanometry, acoustic reflex, and pure tone audiometry. Then the ASSR was tested at carrier frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
The ASSR accurately estimates the behavioral thresholds as well as flat and sloping configurations. There was no correlation between types of hearing loss and difference of behavioral and ASSR thresholds (P = 0.69). The difference between ASSR and behavioral thresholds decreased as severity of hearing loss increased. The 40, 35, 30, and 35 dB could be considered as cutoffs between normal hearing and hearing loss for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively.
The ASSR can accurately predict the degree and configuration of hearing loss and discriminate the normal hearing from mild or moderate hearing loss and mild from moderate hearing loss, except for 500 Hz. The Air-conducted ASSR could not define the type of hearing loss.
听觉稳态反应(ASSR)可提供特定频率的听力敏感度自动评估,用于婴儿及难以测试的成年人。
本研究旨在比较不同类型(正常、传导性和感音神经性)、程度(正常、轻度和中度)及听力敏感度构型(平坦型和斜坡型)的ASSR阈值,并测量不同频率下正常与听力损失之间的临界点。
本临床试验在伊朗进行,纳入了来自耳鼻喉科转诊的患者。总共随机选择了54名成年人(27名感音神经性听力损失患者、17名传导性听力损失患者和10名听力正常者)参与我们的研究。通过耳镜检查、鼓室图、声反射和纯音听力测定来确定听力损失的类型和程度。然后在500、1000、2000和4000Hz的载波频率下测试ASSR。
ASSR能准确估计行为阈值以及平坦型和斜坡型构型。听力损失类型与行为阈值和ASSR阈值差异之间无相关性(P = 0.69)。随着听力损失严重程度增加,ASSR与行为阈值之间的差异减小。40、35、30和35dB可分别视为500、1000、2000和4000Hz正常听力与听力损失之间的临界点。
ASSR可准确预测听力损失的程度和构型,并区分正常听力与轻度或中度听力损失以及轻度与中度听力损失,但500Hz除外。气导ASSR无法确定听力损失的类型。