Department of Neurology, University of Utah, 175 N. Medical Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA,
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015 May;15(5):544. doi: 10.1007/s11910-015-0544-2.
The organization of stroke care has undergone a dramatic evolution in the USA over the last two decades. Beginning with the recommendation for Primary Stroke Centers (PSCs) in 1994, there has been a concerted effort by physicians, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and state legislatures to advance an evidence-based system of care with several tiers of stroke centers. At the apex of this structure are Regional Stroke Centers (RSCs), which do not have official recognition like PSCs and Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs), but their existence as a hub for the many disparate spokes of stroke care in their region is increasingly necessary. Observational evidence suggests that this approach is improving the delivery of stroke care and reducing costs in the USA. Similar efforts are being made in Europe and Asia with encouraging results. The RSC model has the potential to lead to more uniform evidence-based stroke medicine, but many challenges exist.
在过去的二十年中,美国的卒中护理组织发生了巨大的变化。从 1994 年推荐初级卒中中心(PSC)开始,医生、美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会(AHA/ASA)、美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和州立法机构一直在共同努力,建立一个基于证据的卒中护理系统,其中包括几个级别的卒中中心。在这个结构的顶端是区域卒中中心(RSC),它们不像 PSC 和综合卒中中心(CSC)那样有官方认可,但作为其所在地区众多不同卒中护理中心的枢纽,它们的存在越来越必要。观察性证据表明,这种方法正在改善美国的卒中护理服务,并降低成本。欧洲和亚洲也在进行类似的努力,取得了令人鼓舞的结果。RSC 模式有可能带来更统一的基于证据的卒中医学,但仍存在许多挑战。