Kammerlander Barbara, Breiner Hans-Werner, Filker Sabine, Sommaruga Ruben, Sonntag Bettina, Stoeck Thorsten
University of Innsbruck, Institute of Ecology, Lake and Glacier Research Group, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria University of Innsbruck, Research Institute for Limnology, Mondsee, Ciliate Ecology and Taxonomy Group, Mondseestrasse 9, 5310 Mondsee, Austria.
University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Ecology, Gottlieb-Daimler-Strasse Building 14, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015 Apr;91(4). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv010. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
We analyzed the genetic diversity (V4 region of the 18S rRNA) of planktonic microbial eukaryotes in four high mountain lakes including two remote biogeographic regions (the Himalayan mountains and the European Alps) and distinct habitat types (clear and glacier-fed turbid lakes). The recorded high genetic diversity in these lakes was far beyond of what is described from high mountain lake plankton. In total, we detected representatives from 66 families with the main taxon groups being Alveolata (55.0% OTUs 97%, operational taxonomic units), Stramenopiles (34.0% OTUs 97%), Cryptophyta (4.0% OTUs 97%), Chloroplastida (3.6% OTUs 97%) and Fungi (1.7% OTUs 97%). Centrohelida, Choanomonada, Rhizaria, Katablepharidae and Telonema were represented by <1% OTUs 97%. Himalayan lakes harbored a higher plankton diversity compared to the Alpine lakes (Shannon index). Community structures were significantly different between lake types and biogeographic regions (Fisher exact test, P < 0.01). Network analysis revealed that more families of the Chloroplastida (10 vs 5) and the Stramenopiles (14 vs 8) were found in the Himalayan lakes than in the Alpine lakes and none of the fungal families was shared between them. Biogeographic aspects as well as ecological factors such as water turbidity may structure the microbial eukaryote plankton communities in such remote lakes.
我们分析了四个高山湖泊中浮游微生物真核生物的遗传多样性(18S rRNA的V4区域),这四个湖泊包括两个偏远的生物地理区域(喜马拉雅山脉和欧洲阿尔卑斯山脉)以及不同的栖息地类型(清澈的湖泊和冰川补给的浑浊湖泊)。这些湖泊中记录到的高遗传多样性远远超过了高山湖泊浮游生物的描述。我们总共检测到了66个科的代表,主要分类群为囊泡虫类(55.0%的97%操作分类单元,OTUs)、不等鞭毛类(34.0%的97%OTUs)、隐藻门(4.0%的97%OTUs)、绿藻纲(3.6%的97%OTUs)和真菌(1.7%的97%OTUs)。中心辐骨虫纲、领鞭毛虫门、根足虫类、卡氏藻科和纤毛门的代表比例均小于1%的97%OTUs。与阿尔卑斯湖泊相比,喜马拉雅湖泊的浮游生物多样性更高(香农指数)。湖泊类型和生物地理区域之间的群落结构存在显著差异(费舍尔精确检验,P<0.01)。网络分析表明,喜马拉雅湖泊中发现的绿藻纲(10个对5个)和不等鞭毛类(14个对8个)科比阿尔卑斯湖泊更多,且它们之间没有共享任何真菌科。生物地理因素以及诸如水体浑浊度等生态因素可能会构建这些偏远湖泊中微生物真核生物浮游群落的结构。