• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在泰国接受华法林预防卒中的心房颤动患者中的最佳国际标准化比值(INR)水平。

Optimal INR level in Thai atrial fibrillation patients who were receiving warfarin for stroke prevention in Thailand.

作者信息

Methavigul Komsing, Boonyapisit Warangkna

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Dec;97(12):1274-80.

PMID:25764634
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal International Normalized Ratio (INR) level in Thai atrialfibrillation (AF) patients who received warfarin.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This retrospective study enrolled 230 AF patients that received warfarin in Siriraj Hospital between January 1, 2005 andDecember 31, 2009 and collected the INR level at the time of the event, the numbers of ischemic stroke, and bleeding events. The incidence density of ischemic stroke or bleeding events was calculated by dividing the number of ischemic stroke or bleeding event in each INR level with the summation of the time that each patient stayed in each INR group. The patients with a prosthetic valve were excluded. The INR range was classified into six groups (less than 1.5, 1.5 to 1.9, 2.0 to 2.4, 2.5 to 2.9, 3.0 to 3.4, and greater than 3.4). The optimal INR level was defined as the lowest incidence density of ischemic stroke and bleeding complications.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty AF patients (the mean age 68 ± 12 years) were enrolled, contributing to 737.54 patient-years of observation period. Of the 230 patients, nine patients experienced 12 ischemic events (1.6 per 100 patient-years) and 54 patients experienced 57 bleeding events (7.7 per 100 patient-years). The percentage of patient-time spent within INR 2 to 3, INR less than 2, and INR more than 3 were 40.75, 46.22, and 13.03%, respectively. The INR level more than 3.4 increased both major and minor bleeding events (p = 0.001). The INR level of 3.0 to 3.4 increased the minor bleeding events (p = 0.03). The INR level less than 1.5 increased incidence of ischemic stroke (p = 0.03). The overall event rate was lowest in the INR range from 1.5 to 2.9, which is significantly different from that of lNR more than 2.9 (p < 0.0001), but trend lower than INR less than 1.5 without being statistically significant (p = 0.198).

CONCLUSION

An INR of 1.5-2.9 appeared to be associated with the lowest incidence rate of bleeding or ischemic stroke in a cohort of Thai AFpatients receiving warfarin therapy for stroke prevention.

摘要

目的

确定接受华法林治疗的泰国房颤(AF)患者的最佳国际标准化比值(INR)水平。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2005年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间在诗里拉吉医院接受华法林治疗的230例AF患者,并收集了事件发生时的INR水平、缺血性卒中数量和出血事件。缺血性卒中和出血事件的发病密度通过将每个INR水平的缺血性卒中和出血事件数量除以每个患者在每个INR组停留时间的总和来计算。排除有人工瓣膜的患者。INR范围分为六组(小于1.5、1.5至1.9、2.0至2.4、2.5至2.9、3.0至3.4以及大于3.4)。最佳INR水平定义为缺血性卒中和出血并发症的最低发病密度。

结果

纳入230例AF患者(平均年龄68±12岁),观察期为737.54患者年。在这230例患者中,9例患者发生12次缺血性事件(每100患者年1.6次),54例患者发生57次出血事件(每100患者年7.7次)。INR在2至3、INR小于2以及INR大于3的患者时间百分比分别为40.75%、46.22%和13.03%。INR大于3.4会增加严重和轻微出血事件(p = 0.001)。INR为3.0至3.4会增加轻微出血事件(p = 0.03)。INR小于1.5会增加缺血性卒中发生率(p = 0.03)。总体事件发生率在INR范围1.5至2.9时最低,与INR大于2.9时显著不同(p < 0.0001),但低于INR小于1.5时,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.198)。

结论

在一组接受华法林预防卒中治疗的泰国AF患者中,INR为1.5 - 2.9似乎与出血或缺血性卒中的最低发生率相关。

相似文献

1
Optimal INR level in Thai atrial fibrillation patients who were receiving warfarin for stroke prevention in Thailand.在泰国接受华法林预防卒中的心房颤动患者中的最佳国际标准化比值(INR)水平。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Dec;97(12):1274-80.
2
D-Dimer versus International Normalized Ratio of Prothrombin Time in Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Sufficient Warfarin.足量华法林治疗的缺血性中风患者中D-二聚体与凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值的比较
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;25(7):1781-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.03.037. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
3
The lowest effective intensity of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(2):114-9. doi: 10.1159/000086801. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
4
Optimal intensity of international normalized ratio in warfarin therapy for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.华法林治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中二级预防的国际标准化比值最佳强度
Intern Med. 2001 Dec;40(12):1183-8. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.40.1183.
5
Outcomes in a Warfarin-Treated Population With Atrial Fibrillation.华法林治疗的心房颤动患者的结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):172-80. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0199.
6
Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement.机械二尖瓣置换术后华法林治疗的最佳 INR 水平。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1078-3.
7
Association Between Warfarin Control Metrics and Atrial Fibrillation Outcomes in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.在 Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation 中,华法林控制指标与心房颤动结局的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):756-764. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1960.
8
Warfarin anticoagulation and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and metaanalysis.华法林抗凝治疗与心房颤动患者的预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1938-45. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.6.1938.
9
Effect of suboptimal anticoagulation treatment with antiplatelet therapy and warfarin on clinical outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A population-wide cohort study.抗血小板治疗与华法林联用的亚最佳抗凝治疗对非瓣膜性心房颤动患者临床结局的影响:一项全人群队列研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Aug;13(8):1581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.049. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
10
Long-term PT-INR levels and the clinical events in the patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a special reference to low-intensity warfarin therapy.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的长期凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值(PT-INR)水平与临床事件:特别提及低强度华法林治疗
J Cardiol. 2014 Aug;64(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.11.015. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The novel risk score model for predicting the poor anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin.用于预测服用华法林的房颤患者抗凝控制不佳的新型风险评分模型。
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2025 Apr 30;19(2):106-113. doi: 10.2478/abm-2025-0013. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation based on a CHADS-VASc score.基于 CHADS-VASc 评分的亚洲房颤患者口服抗凝药物的净临床获益。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03643-8.
3
Efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation compared between warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants based on SAMe-TTR score.
基于 SAMe-TTR 评分的华法林与非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂比较房颤患者的疗效和安全性结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03053-w.
4
Optimal INR level in patients with atrial fibrillation with EHRA type 2 valvular heart disease receiving warfarin.接受华法林治疗的伴有EHRA 2型瓣膜性心脏病的房颤患者的最佳国际标准化比值(INR)水平。
J Arrhythm. 2020 Apr 15;36(3):425-429. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12342. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Thai Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and a High Risk of Bleeding.直接口服抗凝剂用于预防伴有高出血风险的非瓣膜性心房颤动泰国患者中风的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):279-289. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0741-3.