Suppr超能文献

颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中颅神经损伤的发生率、结局及对生活质量的影响

Incidence, outcomes, and effect on quality of life of cranial nerve injury in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial.

作者信息

Hye Robert J, Mackey Ariane, Hill Michael D, Voeks Jenifer H, Cohen David J, Wang Kaijun, Tom MeeLee, Brott Thomas G

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, Calif.

Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2015 May;61(5):1208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.039. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cranial nerve injury (CNI) is the most common neurologic complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and can cause significant chronic disability. Data from prior randomized trials are limited and provide no health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes specific to CNI. Incidence of CNIs and their outcomes for patients in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST) were examined to identify factors predictive of CNI and their impact on HRQOL.

METHODS

Incidence of CNIs, baseline and procedural characteristics, outcomes, and HRQOL scores were evaluated in the 1151 patients randomized to CEA and undergoing surgery ≤30 days. Patients with CNI were identified and classified using case report forms, adverse event data, and clinical notes. Baseline and procedural characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics. Clinical outcomes at 1 and 12 months were analyzed. All data were adjudicated by two neurologists and a vascular surgeon. HRQOL was evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey to assess general health and Likert scales for disease-specific outcomes at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 months after CEA. The effect of CNI on SF-36 subscales was evaluated using random effects growth curve models, and Likert scale data were compared by ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

CNI was identified in 53 patients (4.6%). Cranial nerves injured were VII (30.2%), XII (24.5%), and IX/X (41.5%), and 3.8% had Horner syndrome. CNI occurred in 52 of 1040 patients (5.0%) receiving general anesthesia and in one of 111 patients (0.9%) operated on under local anesthesia (P = .05). No other predictive baseline or procedural factors were identified. Deficits resolved in 18 patients (34%) at 1 month and in 42 of 52 patients (80.8%) by 1 year. One patient died before the 1-year follow-up visit. The HRQOL evaluation showed no statistical difference between groups with and without CNI at any interval. By Likert scale analysis, the group with CNI showed a significant difference in the difficulty eating/swallowing parameter at 2 and 4 weeks (P < .001) but not at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

In CREST, CNI occurred in 4.6% of patients undergoing CEA, with 34% resolution at 30 days and 80.8% at 1 year. The incidence of CNI was significantly higher in patients undergoing general anesthesia. CNI had a small and transient effect on HRQOL, negatively affecting only difficulty eating/swallowing at 2 and 4 weeks but not at 1 year. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that CNI is not a trivial consequence of CEA but rarely results in significant long-term disability.

摘要

目的

颅神经损伤(CNI)是颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)最常见的神经并发症,可导致严重的慢性残疾。既往随机试验的数据有限,未提供特定于CNI的与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)结果。研究颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中患者的CNI发生率及其结局,以确定预测CNI的因素及其对HRQOL的影响。

方法

对1151例随机接受CEA且手术时间≤30天的患者评估CNI发生率、基线和手术特征、结局及HRQOL评分。使用病例报告表、不良事件数据和临床记录识别并分类CNI患者。采用描述性统计比较基线和手术特征。分析1个月和12个月时的临床结局。所有数据均由两名神经科医生和一名血管外科医生判定。使用医学结局简明36项健康调查(SF-36)评估HRQOL,以评估CEA后2周、4周和12个月的总体健康状况以及针对特定疾病结局的李克特量表。使用随机效应生长曲线模型评估CNI对SF-36子量表的影响,并通过有序逻辑回归比较李克特量表数据。

结果

53例患者(4.6%)发生CNI。受损颅神经为VII(30.2%)、XII(24.5%)和IX/X(41.5%),3.8%有霍纳综合征。1040例接受全身麻醉的患者中有52例(5.0%)发生CNI,111例接受局部麻醉手术的患者中有1例(0.9%)发生CNI(P = 0.05)。未发现其他预测性基线或手术因素。18例患者(34%)在1个月时缺损得到缓解,52例患者中的42例(80.8%)在1年时得到缓解。1例患者在1年随访前死亡。HRQOL评估显示,在任何时间间隔,有和没有CNI的组之间均无统计学差异。通过李克特量表分析,有CNI的组在2周和4周时进食/吞咽困难参数有显著差异(P < 0.001),但在1年时无差异。

结论

在CREST中,接受CEA的患者中有4.6%发生CNI,30天时34%的缺损得到缓解,1年时80.8%得到缓解。接受全身麻醉的患者CNI发生率显著更高。CNI对HRQOL有轻微且短暂的影响,仅在2周和4周时对进食/吞咽困难有负面影响,1年时无影响。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,CNI并非CEA的微不足道的后果,但很少导致严重的长期残疾。

相似文献

4
Discussion.
J Vasc Surg. 2015 May;61(5):1214-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.069. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
5
Literature review of cranial nerve injuries during carotid endarterectomy.
Acta Chir Belg. 2007 Jan-Feb;107(1):25-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2007.11680006.
6
Clinical relevance of cranial nerve injury following carotid endarterectomy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
7
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting versus historical surgical controls for radiation-induced carotid stenosis.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):629-36.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.056. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
9
Cranial nerve injury is associated with dual antiplatelet therapy use and cervical hematoma after carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):985-989.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
10
Risk of persistent cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy.
J Neurosurg. 2004 Sep;101(3):445-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0445.

引用本文的文献

1
Bicentric clinical study: Feasibility of 088 long sheath in trans-radial carotid artery stenting.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 13;48(1):413. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03539-5.
3
Carotid Endarterectomy with Twisted Internal Jugular Vein Located Anterior to the Common Carotid Artery.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 18;20(1):149-154. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791841. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Brazilian Angiology and Vascular Surgery Society Guidelines for the treatment of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.
J Vasc Bras. 2024 May 31;23:e20230094. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300942. eCollection 2024.
6
Treatment of carotid stenosis in asymptomatic, nonoctogenarian, standard risk patients with stenting versus endarterectomy trials.
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1276-1283.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
Surgery for posterior fossa meningioma: elevated postoperative cranial nerve morbidity discards aggressive tumor resection policy.
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01275-6. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
High Mib-1-score correlates with new cranial nerve deficits after surgery for frontal skull base meningioma.
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Feb;44(1):381-387. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01222-0. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
Cervical plexus block.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Aug;71(4):274-288. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00143. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
10
Trials and Frontiers in Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting.
Stroke. 2018 Jul;49(7):1776-1783. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019496. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence, impact, and predictors of cranial nerve palsy and haematoma following carotid endarterectomy in the international carotid stenting study.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;48(5):498-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
2
Clinical relevance of cranial nerve injury following carotid endarterectomy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
4
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
6
Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST).
Int J Stroke. 2010 Feb;5(1):40-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00405.x.
8
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.
9
Does carotid endarterectomy lead to a decline in cognitive function or health related quality of life?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Sep;26(6):817-25. doi: 10.1080/13803390490509420.
10
Risk of persistent cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy.
J Neurosurg. 2004 Sep;101(3):445-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0445.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验