Suppr超能文献

影像演绎推理与新范例。

Imaging deductive reasoning and the new paradigm.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London London, UK.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 27;9:101. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00101. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

There has been a great expansion of research into human reasoning at all of Marr's explanatory levels. There is a tendency for this work to progress within a level largely ignoring the others which can lead to slippage between levels (Chater et al., 2003). It is argued that recent brain imaging research on deductive reasoning-implementational level-has largely ignored the new paradigm in reasoning-computational level (Over, 2009). Consequently, recent imaging results are reviewed with the focus on how they relate to the new paradigm. The imaging results are drawn primarily from a recent meta-analysis by Prado et al. (2011) but further imaging results are also reviewed where relevant. Three main observations are made. First, the main function of the core brain region identified is most likely elaborative, defeasible reasoning not deductive reasoning. Second, the subtraction methodology and the meta-analytic approach may remove all traces of content specific System 1 processes thought to underpin much human reasoning. Third, interpreting the function of the brain regions activated by a task depends on theories of the function that a task engages. When there are multiple interpretations of that function, interpreting what an active brain region is doing is not clear cut. It is concluded that there is a need to more tightly connect brain activation to function, which could be achieved using formalized computational level models and a parametric variation approach.

摘要

在马的所有解释层面上,对人类推理的研究都有了很大的扩展。这项工作往往在一个层面上进行,而在很大程度上忽略了其他层面,这可能导致层面之间的滑动(Chatter 等人,2003)。有人认为,最近关于演绎推理的大脑成像研究——实现层面——在很大程度上忽略了推理的新范式——计算层面(Over,2009)。因此,本文主要关注如何与新范式相关,对最近的成像结果进行了回顾。成像结果主要来自 Prado 等人最近的一项荟萃分析(2011 年),但在相关的地方也回顾了进一步的成像结果。得出了三个主要观察结果。首先,确定的核心脑区的主要功能很可能是详尽的、可反驳的推理,而不是演绎推理。其次,减法方法和元分析方法可能会消除所有认为是人类推理基础的系统 1 内容特定过程的痕迹。第三,解释任务激活的大脑区域的功能取决于任务所涉及的功能理论。当对该功能有多种解释时,解释活跃的大脑区域在做什么就不那么清楚了。结论是需要更紧密地将大脑激活与功能联系起来,这可以通过使用形式化的计算层面模型和参数变化方法来实现。

相似文献

1
Imaging deductive reasoning and the new paradigm.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 27;9:101. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00101. eCollection 2015.
2
Logic as Marr's Computational Level: Four Case Studies.
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;7(2):287-98. doi: 10.1111/tops.12125. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
3
How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:123-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
4
Brain imaging, forward inference, and theories of reasoning.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 9;8:1056. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01056. eCollection 2014.
5
The brain network for deductive reasoning: a quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroimaging studies.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3483-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00063. Epub 2011 May 13.
6
Are there reasons to challenge a symbolic computationalist approach in explaining deductive reasoning?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2008 Jun;42(2):212-8. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9047-2. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
7
Marr's Attacks: On Reductionism and Vagueness.
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;7(2):323-35. doi: 10.1111/tops.12133. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Anatomy of deductive reasoning.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Oct;11(10):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
9
A Cortical Surface-Based Meta-Analysis of Human Reasoning.
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Oct 22;31(12):5497-5510. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab174.
10
Distinct brain loci in deductive versus probabilistic reasoning.
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Apr;36(4):369-76. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00099-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Partially dissociative role of the left inferior frontal gyrus and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in reasoning.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0312919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312919. eCollection 2024.
2
Specificity effects in reasoning with counterintuitive and arbitrary conditionals.
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):366-377. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01235-5. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
Brain electrical traits of logical validity.
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 12;11(1):7982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87191-1.
4
TMS applied to V1 can facilitate reasoning.
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Aug;236(8):2277-2286. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5296-1. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Aristotle Meets Zeno: Psychophysiological Evidence.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 29;11(12):e0168067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168067. eCollection 2016.
7
Episodes, events, and models.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 27;9:590. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00590. eCollection 2015.
8
Nothing new under the sun, or the moon, or both.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Nov 3;9:588. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00588. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Bias and Conflict: A Case for Logical Intuitions.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):28-38. doi: 10.1177/1745691611429354. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
2
How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:123-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
3
An ERP investigation of conditional reasoning with emotional and neutral contents.
Brain Cogn. 2014 Nov;91:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
4
The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 8;5:765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00765. eCollection 2014.
5
Disabling conditional inferences: an EEG study.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477. Epub 2013 May 10.
7
Deduction electrified: ERPs elicited by the processing of words in conditional arguments.
Brain Lang. 2013 Mar;124(3):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
8
Neuronal effects of auditory distraction on visual attention.
Brain Cogn. 2013 Mar;81(2):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
10
How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality.
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Oct 9;14(11):1475-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.2949.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验