Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of Toulouse, France
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):28-38. doi: 10.1177/1745691611429354. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
Human reasoning has been characterized as often biased, heuristic, and illogical. In this article, I consider recent findings establishing that, despite the widespread bias and logical errors, people at least implicitly detect that their heuristic response conflicts with traditional normative considerations. I propose that this conflict sensitivity calls for the postulation of logical and probabilistic knowledge that is intuitive and that is activated automatically when people engage in a reasoning task. I sketch the basic characteristics of these intuitions and point to implications for ongoing debates in the field.
人类的推理能力常被认为具有偏差、启发式和不合逻辑的特点。在本文中,我考虑了最近的发现,这些发现表明,尽管存在广泛的偏差和逻辑错误,人们至少会潜意识地察觉到他们的启发式反应与传统的规范考虑因素相冲突。我提出,这种冲突敏感性要求假设逻辑和概率知识是直观的,并在人们进行推理任务时自动激活。我概述了这些直觉的基本特征,并指出了它们对该领域正在进行的争论的影响。