Freeman Sonya, Yu Rongjun, Egorova Natalia, Chen Xiaoyan, Kirsch Irving, Claggett Brian, Kaptchuk Ted J, Gollub Randy L, Kong Jian
Psychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Psychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
Expectations shape the way we experience the world. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate how positive and negative expectation can change pain experiences in the same cohort of subjects. We first manipulated subjects' treatment expectation of the effectiveness of three inert creams, with one cream labeled "Lidocaine" (positive expectancy), one labeled "Capsaicin" (negative expectancy) and one labeled "Neutral" by surreptitiously decreasing, increasing, or not changing respectively, the intensity of the noxious stimuli administered following cream application. We then used fMRI to investigate the signal changes associated with administration of identical pain stimuli before and after the treatment and control creams. Twenty-four healthy adults completed the study. Results showed that expectancy significantly modulated subjective pain ratings. After controlling for changes in the neutral condition, the subjective pain rating changes evoked by positive and negative expectancies were significantly associated. fMRI results showed that the expectation of an increase in pain induced significant fMRI signal changes in the insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and periaqueductal gray, whereas the expectation of pain relief evoked significant fMRI signal changes in the striatum. No brain regions were identified as common to both "Capsaicin" and "Lidocaine" conditioning. There was also no significant association between the brain response to identical noxious stimuli in the pain matrix evoked by positive and negative expectancies. Our findings suggest that positive and negative expectancies engage different brain networks to modulate our pain experiences, but, overall, these distinct patterns of neural activation result in a correlated placebo and nocebo behavioral response.
期望塑造我们体验世界的方式。在本研究中,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来探究积极和消极期望如何改变同一组受试者的疼痛体验。我们首先操纵受试者对三种惰性乳膏有效性的治疗期望,其中一种乳膏标记为“利多卡因”(积极期望),一种标记为“辣椒素”(消极期望),还有一种标记为“中性”,通过在涂抹乳膏后分别秘密地降低、增加或不改变有害刺激的强度来实现。然后我们使用fMRI来研究在涂抹治疗和对照乳膏前后给予相同疼痛刺激时相关的信号变化。24名健康成年人完成了这项研究。结果表明,期望显著调节了主观疼痛评分。在控制了中性条件下的变化后,积极和消极期望引起的主观疼痛评分变化显著相关。功能磁共振成像结果显示,对疼痛增加的期望在脑岛、眶额皮质和导水管周围灰质中引起了显著的功能磁共振成像信号变化,而对疼痛缓解的期望在纹状体中引起了显著的功能磁共振成像信号变化。没有发现脑区在“辣椒素”和“利多卡因”条件作用下是共同的。积极和消极期望在疼痛矩阵中对相同有害刺激的脑反应之间也没有显著关联。我们的研究结果表明,积极和消极期望涉及不同的脑网络来调节我们的疼痛体验,但总体而言,这些不同的神经激活模式导致了相关的安慰剂和反安慰剂行为反应。
Neuroimage. 2015-5-15
Neuroimage. 2017-10-28
Med Sci Monit. 2023-9-19
Neuroradiology. 2023-10
Neuron. 2014-3-19
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014-2-25
Sci Transl Med. 2014-1-8
J Neurosci. 2013-8-21