Utomi Victor, Oxborough David, Ashley Euan, Lord Rachel, Fletcher Sarah, Stembridge Mike, Shave Rob, Hoffman Martin D, Whyte Greg, Somauroo John, Sharma Sanjay, George Keith
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moore's University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK,
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Aug;115(8):1673-82. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3147-3. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
The traditional view of differential left ventricular adaptation to training type has been questioned. Right ventricular (RV) data in athletes are emerging but whether training type mediates this is not clear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the RV phenotype in endurance- vs. resistance-trained male athletes. Secondary aims included comparison of RV function in all groups using myocardial speckle tracking, and the impact of allometric scaling on RV data interpretation.
A prospective cross-sectional design assessed RV structure and function in 19 endurance-trained (ET), 21 resistance-trained (RT) and 21 sedentary control subjects (CT). Standard 2D tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking echocardiography assessed RV structure and function. Indexing of RV structural parameters to body surface area (BSA) was undertaken using allometric scaling.
A higher absolute RV diastolic area was observed in ET (mean ± SD: 27 ± 4 cm(2)) compared to CT (22 ± 4 cm(2); P < 0.05) that was maintained after scaling. Whilst absolute RV longitudinal dimension was greater in ET (88 ± 9 mm) than CT (81 ± 10 mm; P < 0.05), this difference was removed after scaling. Wall thickness was not different between ET and RT and there were no between group differences in global or regional RV function.
We present some evidence of RV adaptation to chronic ET in male athletes but limited structural characteristics of an athletic heart were observed in RT. Global and regional RV functions were comparable between groups. Allometric scaling altered data interpretation in some variables.
关于左心室对训练类型的差异性适应的传统观点受到了质疑。运动员右心室(RV)的数据正在不断涌现,但训练类型是否介导了这一过程尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是评估耐力训练与阻力训练的男性运动员的右心室表型。次要目的包括使用心肌斑点追踪比较所有组的右心室功能,以及异速生长标度对右心室数据解读的影响。
采用前瞻性横断面设计评估了19名耐力训练(ET)、21名阻力训练(RT)和21名久坐对照受试者(CT)的右心室结构和功能。使用标准二维组织多普勒成像和斑点追踪超声心动图评估右心室结构和功能。采用异速生长标度将右心室结构参数标化到体表面积(BSA)。
与CT组(22±4 cm²)相比,ET组观察到更高的右心室舒张期绝对面积(均值±标准差:27±4 cm²;P<0.05),标化后该差异依然存在。虽然ET组的右心室绝对纵向维度(88±9 mm)大于CT组(81±10 mm;P<0.05),但标化后该差异消失。ET组和RT组之间的壁厚无差异,且各组之间的整体或局部右心室功能无差异。
我们提供了一些证据表明男性运动员的右心室对慢性耐力训练有适应性,但在阻力训练运动员中观察到的运动心脏结构特征有限。各组之间的整体和局部右心室功能相当。异速生长标度改变了一些变量的数据解读。