• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植中器官分配的决策支持

Decision support for organ offers in liver transplantation.

作者信息

Volk Michael L, Goodrich Nathan, Lai Jennifer C, Sonnenday Christopher, Shedden Kerby

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Transplantation Institute, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.

Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2015 Jun;21(6):784-91. doi: 10.1002/lt.24113. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1002/lt.24113
PMID:25779757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4744650/
Abstract

Organ offers in liver transplantation are high-risk medical decisions with a low certainty of whether a better liver offer will come along before death. We hypothesized that decision support could improve the decision to accept or decline. With data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, survival models were constructed for 42,857 waiting-list patients and 28,653 posttransplant patients from 2002 to 2008. Daily covariate-adjusted survival probabilities from these 2 models were combined into a 5-year area under the curve to create an individualized prediction of whether an organ offer should be accepted for a given patient. Among 650,832 organ offers from 2008 to 2013, patient survival was compared by whether the clinical decision was concordant or discordant with model predictions. The acceptance benefit (AB)--the predicted gain or loss of life by accepting a given organ versus waiting for the next organ--ranged from 3 to -22 years (harm) and varied geographically; for example, the average benefit of accepting a donation after cardiac death organ ranged from 0.47 to -0.71 years by donation service area. Among organ offers, even when AB was >1 year, the offer was only accepted 10% of the time. Patient survival from the time of the organ offer was better if the model recommendations and the clinical decision were concordant: for offers with AB > 0, the 3-year survival was 80% if the offer was accepted and 66% if it was declined (P < 0.001). In conclusion, augmenting clinical judgment with decision support may improve patient survival in liver transplantation.

摘要

肝移植中的器官供体选择是高风险的医疗决策,很难确定在患者死亡前是否会有更好的肝脏供体出现。我们假设决策支持可以改善接受或拒绝的决策。利用器官移植受者科学登记处的数据,为2002年至2008年的42857名等待名单患者和28653名移植后患者构建了生存模型。将这两个模型中每日经协变量调整的生存概率合并为5年曲线下面积,以对特定患者是否应接受器官供体进行个体化预测。在2008年至2013年的650832次器官供体中,根据临床决策与模型预测是否一致,比较了患者的生存率。接受益处(AB)——接受给定器官与等待下一个器官相比预测的生命增益或损失——范围为3至-22年(损害),且存在地域差异;例如,按捐赠服务区划分,接受心脏死亡后器官捐赠的平均益处为0.47至-0.71年。在器官供体中,即使AB>1年,接受供体的情况也仅占10%。如果模型建议与临床决策一致,从器官供体时起患者的生存率会更高:对于AB>0的供体,接受供体时3年生存率为80%,拒绝时为66%(P<0.001)。总之,通过决策支持增强临床判断可能会提高肝移植患者的生存率。

相似文献

1
Decision support for organ offers in liver transplantation.肝移植中器官分配的决策支持
Liver Transpl. 2015 Jun;21(6):784-91. doi: 10.1002/lt.24113. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
2
Beyond utilitarianism: a method for analyzing competing ethical principles in a decision analysis of liver transplantation.
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):763-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08316999. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
3
Liver transplant center variability in accepting organ offers and its impact on patient survival.肝移植中心在接受器官供体方面的差异及其对患者生存率的影响。
J Hepatol. 2016 Apr;64(4):843-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
Shared decision making in transplantation: how patients see their role in the decision process of accepting a donor liver.移植中的共同决策:患者如何看待自己在接受供体肝脏决策过程中的角色。
Liver Transpl. 2014 Sep;20(9):1072-80. doi: 10.1002/lt.23921.
5
Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era.在肝移植中是否有更好的分配指南?一种针对终末期肝病模型时代的正义和效用的新评分。
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):745-53; discussion 753. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182365081.
6
Serum sodium and survival benefit of liver transplantation.血清钠与肝移植的生存获益
Liver Transpl. 2015 Mar;21(3):308-13. doi: 10.1002/lt.24063. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
7
Effect of alcoholic liver disease and hepatitis C infection on waiting list and posttransplant mortality and transplant survival benefit.酒精性肝病和丙型肝炎感染对等待名单、移植后死亡率及移植生存获益的影响。
Hepatology. 2009 Aug;50(2):400-6. doi: 10.1002/hep.23007.
8
Use of model for end-stage liver disease exceptions for donation after cardiac death graft recipients relisted for liver transplantation.应用终末期肝病模型例外规定,使因心死亡后器官捐献而接受移植的肝移植受者再次获得肝移植资格。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Apr;21(4):554-60. doi: 10.1002/lt.24079.
9
Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis.终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统下用于尸体供肝移植的扩大标准供体移植物:一项决策分析
Liver Transpl. 2004 Dec;10(12):1468-75. doi: 10.1002/lt.20304.
10
Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.巴西实施终末期肝病模型系统进行肝脏分配的后果。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-Task Learning for Post-transplant Cause of Death Analysis: A Case Study on Liver Transplant.多任务学习在移植后死因分析中的应用:以肝移植为例的研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:913-922. eCollection 2023.
2
Declined Organs for Liver Transplantation: A Right Decision or a Missed Opportunity for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma?肝移植被拒绝的器官:对肝细胞癌患者来说是正确的决定还是错失的机会?
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;15(5):1365. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051365.
3
Can Behavioral Research Improve Transplant Decision-Making? A Mock Offer Study on the Role of Kidney Procurement Biopsies.行为研究能否改善移植决策?一项关于肾活检在器官获取中作用的模拟报价研究
Kidney360. 2020 Jan 6;1(1):36-47. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000212019. eCollection 2020 Jan 30.
4
Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions.设计用于器官供体决策的肝移植患者及家属决策支持工具。
Transplant Direct. 2021 Apr 27;7(5):e695. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001140. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Model to Estimate Early Allograft Failure Among Patients Requiring Early Liver Retransplant.用于评估需要早期肝脏再次移植患者早期移植肝失功的综合模型的开发与验证
JAMA Surg. 2020 Dec 1;155(12):e204095. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4095. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
Survival benefit of accepting livers from deceased donors over 70 years old.从超过 70 岁的已故供体接受肝脏的生存获益。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2020-2028. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15250. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Heart and lung organ offer acceptance practices of transplant programs are associated with waitlist mortality and organ yield.心脏和肺脏器官移植项目的接受者实践与候补者死亡率和器官供体数量有关。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):2061-2067. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14885. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List.对移植等待名单上儿科候选者肝脏供体情况的分析。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):988-995. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.053. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
9
Share 35 changes in center-level liver acceptance practices.分享中心层面肝脏接受标准的35项变化。
Liver Transpl. 2017 May;23(5):604-613. doi: 10.1002/lt.24749.

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty predicts waitlist mortality in liver transplant candidates.衰弱可预测肝移植候选者在等待名单上的死亡率。
Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1870-9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12762. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
2
Systematic bias in surgeons' predictions of the donor-specific risk of liver transplant graft failure.外科医生对肝移植移植物失败的供体特异性风险预测中的系统偏差。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Sep;19(9):987-90. doi: 10.1002/lt.23683. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
3
Center competition and outcomes following liver transplantation.肝移植后的中心竞争与结果。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jan;19(1):96-104. doi: 10.1002/lt.23561.
4
Declined organ offers in liver transplantation: careful timing or missed opportunity?
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1141-1143. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.022. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
5
An examination of liver offers to candidates on the liver transplant wait-list.对肝移植候补者进行肝脏检查。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1261-1265. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.105. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
6
Variation in organ quality between liver transplant centers.不同肝移植中心间的器官质量差异。
Am J Transplant. 2011 May;11(5):958-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03487.x. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
7
Sarcopenia and mortality after liver transplantation.肌肉减少症与肝移植术后死亡率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Aug;211(2):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.039. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
8
Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation.基于生存获益的脑死亡供体肝脏分配
Am J Transplant. 2009 Apr;9(4 Pt 2):970-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02571.x.
9
Impact of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy on the use of high-risk organs for liver transplantation.终末期肝病分配政策模型对高风险肝脏移植器官使用的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Nov;135(5):1568-74. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.003.
10
The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.已故供体肝移植的生存获益与候选者疾病严重程度及供体质量的关系。
Am J Transplant. 2008 Feb;8(2):419-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02086.x. Epub 2008 Jan 7.