Banegas José R, de la Cruz Juan J, Graciani Auxiliadora, López-García Esther, Gijón-Conde Teresa, Ruilope Luis M, Rodriguez-Artalejo Fernando
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid ⁄ IdiPAZ - CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Jun;17(6):453-61. doi: 10.1111/jch.12525. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) accurately classifies blood pressure (BP) status but its impact on the prevalence and control of hypertension is little known. The authors conducted a cross-sectional study in 2012 among 1047 individuals 60 years and older from the follow-up of a population cohort in Spain. Three casual BP measurements and 24-hour ABPM were performed under standardized conditions. Approximately 68.8% patients were hypertensive based on casual BP (≥140/90 mm Hg or current BP medication use) and 62.1% based on 24-hour ABPM (≥130/80 mm Hg or current BP medication use) (P=.009). The proportion of patients with treatment-eligible hypertension who met BP goals increased from 37.4% based on the casual BP target to 54.1% based on the 24-hour BP target (absolute difference, 16.7%; P<.01). These results were consistent across alternative BP thresholds. Therefore, compared with casual BP, 24-hour ABPM led to a reduction in the proportion of older patients recommended for hypertension treatment and a substantial increase in the proportion of those with hypertension control.
动态血压监测(ABPM)能准确分类血压(BP)状态,但其对高血压患病率和控制情况的影响却鲜为人知。作者于2012年对西班牙一个人群队列随访中的1047名60岁及以上个体进行了一项横断面研究。在标准化条件下进行了三次偶测血压测量和24小时动态血压监测。基于偶测血压(≥140/90 mmHg或正在使用降压药物),约68.8%的患者为高血压患者;基于24小时动态血压监测(≥130/80 mmHg或正在使用降压药物),这一比例为62.1%(P = 0.009)。符合治疗条件的高血压患者中,达到血压目标的比例从基于偶测血压目标的37.4%增至基于24小时血压目标的54.1%(绝对差值为16.7%;P < 0.01)。这些结果在不同的血压阈值下均一致。因此,与偶测血压相比,24小时动态血压监测使推荐接受高血压治疗的老年患者比例降低,且高血压得到控制的患者比例大幅增加。