Cossette Sylvie, Vadeboncoeur Alain, Frasure-Smith Nancy, McCusker Jane, Perreault Danielle, Guertin Marie-Claude
*Faculty of Nursing,University of Montreal, andMontreal Heart Institute Research Center.
†Emergency Department,Montreal Heart Institute.
CJEM. 2015 Jan;17(1):13-20. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.131291.
To determine whether a nursing intervention delivered at emergency department (ED) discharge would reduce ED revisits.
A randomized study was conducted in the ED of a tertiary cardiac hospital in Montreal, Quebec. Between November 2006 and March 2010, 3,795 patients were assessed for eligibility based on two risk factors for ED revisits (≥1 ED visit in the past year and ≥6 medications); 132 were randomized to the experimental group (EG) and 133 to the control group (CG). The intervention included one nurse-patient meeting before leaving the ED, with two additional telephone contacts over the next 2 weeks. The primary outcome was time to ED revisits within 30 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to ED revisits over 90, 180, and 365 days and hospitalizations over 30, 90, 180, and 365 days.
A planned interim analysis that stopped the study with half of the planned sample showed that the time to ED revisits was similar in both groups at 30 days (p=0.81; revisits: 18.2% in EG, 19.6% in CG), 90 days (p=0.44), 180 days (p=0.98), and 365 days (p=0.75). The only difference identified was a lower hospitalization proportion at 180 days in the EG group (13.6% v. 24.1%; p=0.038).
These findings are consistent with previous research showing that few ED-based interventions are successful in reducing ED returns. Factors other than those targeted by the intervention, including an improvement in usual care, may explain the findings.
确定在急诊科(ED)出院时实施的护理干预措施是否能减少再次就诊于急诊科的情况。
在魁北克省蒙特利尔市一家三级心脏病专科医院的急诊科进行了一项随机研究。2006年11月至2010年3月期间,根据再次就诊于急诊科的两个风险因素(过去一年中≥1次急诊科就诊以及≥6种药物治疗)对3795名患者进行了资格评估;132名被随机分配至实验组(EG),133名被分配至对照组(CG)。干预措施包括在离开急诊科前进行一次护士与患者的会面,并在接下来的2周内再进行两次电话随访。主要结局指标为出院后30天内再次就诊于急诊科的时间。次要结局指标包括90天、180天和365天再次就诊于急诊科的时间以及30天、90天、180天和365天内的住院情况。
一项计划性中期分析在纳入了计划样本的一半时停止了该研究,结果显示两组在30天(p = 0.81;再次就诊率:EG组为18.2%,CG组为19.6%)、90天(p = 0.44)、180天(p = 0.98)和365天(p = 0.75)时再次就诊于急诊科的时间相似。唯一发现的差异是EG组在180天时的住院比例较低(13.6%对24.1%;p = 0.038)。
这些结果与之前的研究一致,表明很少有基于急诊科的干预措施能成功减少再次就诊于急诊科的情况。除干预措施所针对的因素外,其他因素(包括常规护理的改善)可能可以解释这些结果。