Wuyts Joke, Foulon Veerle, Allemann Samuel Sebastian, Boeni Fabienne
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12024-6.
Care transitions, specifically hospital discharge, hold a risk for drug-related problems and medication errors. Effective interventions that optimise medication use during and after transitions are needed, yet there is no standardisation of the outcomes. This literature review aimed at collecting outcomes from studies investigating how to optimise medication use of patients following hospital discharge, and to categorise them, as a first step in the development of a core outcome set.
We systematically reviewed quantitative and qualitative literature using Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and the EU Clinical Trial Register databases. Studies investigating the optimisation of medication use following hospital discharge were eligible. The quantitative literature review specifically included trials and protocols that evaluated the effect of an intervention for patients ≥ 65 years or multimorbid / polypharmacy patients, as they are at high risk of drug-related problems. The qualitative literature review focused on the patients' and healthcare professionals' views. Outcomes were summarised into unique outcome terms and categorised using an adapted version of the OMERACT filter 2.0.
The review included 75 quantitative and 20 qualitative studies. The interventions investigated in the quantitative literature mostly had multiple components performed either pre- or post-discharge. Sixty percent of the qualitative studies addressed the views of healthcare professionals, 40% the views of patients, and only one study addressed both. A median of 5 outcomes (range 1-17) were reported in the quantitative studies. In total, 91 unique outcomes were identified from the quantitative or qualitative literature, or both (73, 12 and 6 outcomes, respectively). Outcomes were categorised into five domains: 'medication' (n = 32 outcomes), 'economic impact/resource use' (n = 26), 'life impact' (n = 16), 'pathophysiological manifestations' (n = 15) and 'death' (n = 2). The top 5 most frequently measured outcomes in quantitative studies were number of readmissions (n = 54/75, 72%), mortality (n = 30/75, 40%), number of emergency department visits (n = 26/75, 35%), number of outpatient physician visits (n = 12/75, 16%), and medication adherence (n = 12/75, 16%).
This study identified a large number of different outcomes, especially in the domains medication and economic impact/resource use. This heterogeneity impedes the identification of effective interventions and confirms the need for a core outcome set.
医疗过渡,尤其是医院出院环节,存在药物相关问题和用药错误的风险。需要有效的干预措施来优化过渡期间及之后的药物使用,但结果尚无标准化。本系统综述旨在收集研究如何优化出院患者药物使用的研究结果,并对其进行分类,作为制定核心结局集的第一步。
我们使用Embase、PubMed、CINAHL和欧盟临床试验注册数据库对定量和定性文献进行了系统综述。调查出院后药物使用优化情况的研究符合纳入标准。定量文献综述特别纳入了评估干预措施对65岁及以上患者或患有多种疾病/使用多种药物患者效果的试验和方案,因为这些患者存在药物相关问题的高风险。定性文献综述侧重于患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点。结果被总结为独特的结局术语,并使用OMERACT过滤器2.0的改编版本进行分类。
该综述纳入了75项定量研究和20项定性研究。定量文献中研究的干预措施大多在出院前或出院后有多个组成部分。60%的定性研究涉及医疗保健专业人员的观点,40%涉及患者的观点,只有一项研究涉及两者。定量研究中报告的结局中位数为5个(范围1 - 17个)。总共从定量或定性文献或两者中确定了91个独特的结局(分别为73个、12个和6个结局)。结局被分为五个领域:“药物”(n = 32个结局)、“经济影响/资源使用”(n = 26个)、“生活影响”(n = 16个)、“病理生理表现”(n = 15个)和“死亡”(n = 2个)。定量研究中最常测量的前5个结局是再入院次数(n = 54/75,72%)、死亡率(n = 30/75,40%)、急诊就诊次数(n = 26/75,35%)、门诊医生就诊次数(n = 12/75,16%)和药物依从性(n = 12/75,16%)。
本研究确定了大量不同的结局,尤其是在药物和经济影响/资源使用领域。这种异质性阻碍了有效干预措施的识别,并证实了需要一个核心结局集。