Eftekharian Ali, Amizadeh Maryam
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shahid-Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jan;126(1):150-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.25244. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate in patients with idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss whether pulse therapy with methylprednisolone leads to better recovery of hearing than traditional oral prednisolone therapy.
Randomized controlled trial.
Sixty-seven patients diagnosed with idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss were randomly divided into two groups based on therapy. The study group received 500-mg daily intravenous methylprednisolone for 3 consecutive days, followed by 1 mg/kg (maximum 60 mg) oral prednisolone for 11 days (total treatment: 14 days). The control group received 1 mg/kg (maximum 60 mg) oral prednisolone for 14 days. Hearing change was evaluated by comparing initial hearing tests and the third-month hearing tests in three ways: 1) pure tone improvement in each individual tone (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz); 2) word-recognition score improvement; and 3) complete, partial, and no recovery of hearing calculated (as defined by American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines).
Sixty of 67 patients, 29 of 34 patients in the study group and 31 of 33 patients in the control group, completed the study. Frequency-specific hearing improvement did not differ significantly among the groups. Word-recognition score improvement was 20.34% ± 27.35% for the study group and 13.41% ± 23.48% for the control group, which had no statistically significant difference. There was also no significant difference in hearing recovery rates for the two groups.
Pulse therapy with methylprednisolone and traditional oral prednisolone therapy resulted in similar hearing improvement.
目的/假设:评估在特发性感音神经性听力损失患者中,甲泼尼龙脉冲疗法是否比传统口服泼尼松疗法能带来更好的听力恢复。
随机对照试验。
67例被诊断为特发性感音神经性听力损失的患者根据治疗方法随机分为两组。研究组连续3天每日静脉注射500毫克甲泼尼龙,随后11天口服1毫克/千克(最大剂量60毫克)泼尼松(总疗程:14天)。对照组14天口服1毫克/千克(最大剂量60毫克)泼尼松。通过比较初始听力测试和第三个月的听力测试,以三种方式评估听力变化:1)每个单音(0.5、1、2、3和4千赫)的纯音改善情况;2)单词识别分数的改善情况;3)计算听力完全恢复、部分恢复和未恢复的情况(按照美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会临床实践指南的定义)。
67例患者中的60例,研究组34例中的29例和对照组33例中的31例完成了研究。各频率的听力改善在两组间无显著差异。研究组的单词识别分数改善为20.34%±27.35%,对照组为13.41%±23.48%,差异无统计学意义。两组的听力恢复率也无显著差异。
甲泼尼龙脉冲疗法和传统口服泼尼松疗法在听力改善方面效果相似。