Science & Co, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diabetologia. 2015 May;58(5):862-70. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3513-z. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Insulin pump therapy, also known as continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), is an important and evolving form of insulin delivery, which is mainly used for people with type 1 diabetes. However, even with modern insulin pumps, errors of insulin infusion can occur due to pump failure, insulin infusion set (IIS) blockage, infusion site problems, insulin stability issues, user error or a combination of these. Users are therefore exposed to significant and potentially fatal hazards: interruption of insulin infusion can result in hyperglycaemia and ketoacidosis; conversely, delivery of excessive insulin can cause severe hypoglycaemia. Nevertheless, the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of CSII remains limited. The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and American Diabetes Association (ADA) have therefore joined forces to review the systems in place for evaluating the safety of pumps from a clinical perspective. We found that useful information held by the manufacturing companies is not currently shared in a sufficiently transparent manner. Public availability of adverse event (AE) reports on the US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database is potentially a rich source of safety information but is insufficiently utilised due to the current configuration of the system; the comparable database in Europe (European Databank on Medical Devices, EUDAMED) is not publicly accessible. Many AEs appear to be attributable to human factors and/or user error, but the extent to which manufacturing companies are required by regulators to consider the interactions of users with the technical features of their products is limited. The clinical studies required by regulators prior to marketing are small and over-reliant on bench testing in relation to 'predicate' products. Once a pump is available on the market, insufficient data are made publicly available on its long-term use in a real-world setting; such data could provide vital information to help healthcare teams to educate and support users, and thereby prevent AEs. As well as requiring more from the manufacturing companies, we call for public funding of more research addressing clinically important questions in relation to pump therapy: both observational studies and clinical trials. At present there are significant differences in the regulatory systems between the USA and European Union at both pre- and post-marketing stages; improvements in the European system are more urgently required. This statement concludes with a series of recommended specific actions for 'meknovigilance' (i.e. a standardised safety approach to technology) which could be implemented to address the shortcomings we highlight.
胰岛素泵治疗,也称为持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII),是一种重要且不断发展的胰岛素输送形式,主要用于 1 型糖尿病患者。然而,即使使用现代胰岛素泵,由于泵故障、胰岛素输注套件(IIS)堵塞、输注部位问题、胰岛素稳定性问题、用户错误或这些问题的组合,也可能会发生胰岛素输注错误。因此,用户面临着重大且潜在致命的危险:胰岛素输注中断会导致高血糖和酮症酸中毒;相反,输注过多的胰岛素会导致严重的低血糖。尽管如此,关于 CSII 的安全性和疗效的现有证据仍然有限。因此,欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA)已联手从临床角度审查评估泵安全性的现有系统。我们发现,制造公司持有的有用信息目前没有以足够透明的方式共享。美国食品和药物管理局的制造商和用户设施设备经验(MAUDE)数据库中不良事件(AE)报告的公开可用性可能是一个丰富的安全信息来源,但由于系统当前的配置,利用不足;欧洲类似的数据库(欧洲医疗器械数据库,EUDAMED)无法公开访问。许多 AE 似乎归因于人为因素和/或用户错误,但监管机构要求制造公司考虑到用户与产品技术特征之间的相互作用的程度有限。监管机构在上市前要求进行的临床研究规模较小,并且与“前导”产品相关的实验室测试过于依赖。一旦泵在市场上可用,关于其在真实环境中长期使用的公开数据就不足;这些数据可以提供重要信息,帮助医疗团队教育和支持用户,从而预防 AE。除了对制造公司提出更高的要求外,我们还呼吁为解决与泵治疗相关的临床重要问题的研究提供公共资金:包括观察性研究和临床试验。目前,美国和欧盟在上市前和上市后阶段的监管系统存在重大差异;欧洲系统更迫切需要改进。本声明最后提出了一系列针对“meknovigilance”(即对技术的标准化安全方法)的建议具体行动,这些行动可以实施以解决我们所强调的不足之处。