Ross P, Gray A R, Milburn J, Kumarasamy I M, Wu F, Farrand S, Armishaw J, Wiltshire E, Rayns J, Tomlinson P, Wheeler B J
Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Dec;53(6):991-998. doi: 10.1007/s00592-016-0897-2. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
While there have been many outcome-focussed studies examining insulin pump therapy, only a few have looked at potential adverse events (AEs), with none examining the relationship between AEs and pump/infusion set type, ethnicity or socio-economic status. In addition, current data on the incidence and characteristics of pump-associated AEs are confined to one paediatric centre. We aimed to describe the incidence, characteristics and potential predictors of insulin pump-associated AEs in New Zealand adults and children with T1DM.
We approached adults and families of children with T1DM on insulin pumps in four main New Zealand centres. Participants completed a questionnaire examining pump-related issues they had experienced in the preceding 12 months.
Response rate was 64 % with 174 of 270 eligible people participating in the study. 84 % of subjects reported one or more AEs, with an overall AE incidence of 3.42 per person/year (95 % CI 3.14, 3.73). An event serious enough to require a hospital presentation occurred in 9.8 %, all but one reporting high ketones or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Set/site problems were the AE most commonly reported (by 53 % of respondents), followed by cutaneous complications (43 %) and pump malfunction (38 %). Few predictors of AEs (of any type) were found; however, a negative binomial regression model found that a longer duration of pumping (p = 0.018) and age <18 years (p = 0.043) were both associated with fewer AEs (all types combined).
Insulin pump-associated AEs are very common. However, few variables are predictive of them with no relationships seen with glycaemic control, socio-economic status, pump manufacturer or infusion set type. Based on these findings, AEs should be anticipated in both adults and children, with anticipatory patient education and training recommended for their successful and safe use.
虽然已有许多以结果为导向的研究探讨胰岛素泵治疗,但仅有少数研究关注潜在不良事件(AE),且无一研究不良事件与泵/输注装置类型、种族或社会经济地位之间的关系。此外,目前关于泵相关不良事件的发生率和特征的数据仅限于一个儿科中心。我们旨在描述新西兰1型糖尿病成人和儿童中胰岛素泵相关不良事件的发生率、特征及潜在预测因素。
我们在新西兰四个主要中心接触了使用胰岛素泵的1型糖尿病成人及儿童家庭。参与者完成了一份问卷,调查他们在过去12个月中遇到的与泵相关的问题。
应答率为64%,270名符合条件的人中174人参与了研究。84%的受试者报告了一种或多种不良事件,总体不良事件发生率为每人每年3.42次(95%置信区间3.14, 3.73)。9.8%的人发生了严重到需要住院治疗的事件,除一人外,所有报告均为高酮血症或糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)。装置/部位问题是最常报告的不良事件(53%的受访者),其次是皮肤并发症(43%)和泵故障(38%)。几乎未发现不良事件(任何类型)的预测因素;然而,负二项回归模型发现,泵使用时间较长(p = 0.018)和年龄<18岁(p = 0.043)均与较少的不良事件(所有类型合并)相关。
胰岛素泵相关不良事件非常常见。然而,几乎没有变量可预测这些事件,且未发现与血糖控制、社会经济地位、泵制造商或输注装置类型之间存在关联。基于这些发现,成人和儿童都应预期会发生不良事件,建议进行前瞻性患者教育和培训以实现胰岛素泵的成功和安全使用。