• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项简化创伤分诊系统可安全减少过度分诊并提高医护人员满意度的前瞻性研究。

A simplified trauma triage system safely reduces overtriage and improves provider satisfaction: a prospective study.

作者信息

Shawhan Robert R, McVay Derek P, Casey Linda, Spears Tara, Steele Scott R, Martin Matthew J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Drive, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA.

Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Drive, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA; Department of Surgery, Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):856-62; discussion 862-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.008
PMID:25784644
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard triage systems result in high rates of overtriage to achieve acceptably low undertriage. We previously validated optimal triage variables and used these to implement a new simplified triage system (NEW) at our hospital.

METHODS

All trauma entries from May 2010 to Feb 2013 were prospectively reviewed. Calculation of the undertriage and overtriage rates was based on the need for any urgent or life-saving intervention.

RESULTS

We identified 704 trauma patients. Level 1 activations were reduced from 32% (OLD) to 19% in the NEW system (P < .05). Overtriage was reduced from 79% (OLD) to 44% in the NEW system (P < .01). The undertriage rate was 1.6% in the NEW system, compared with 1.2% in the OLD system (P = nonsignificant). Of all patients, 14% (63) required a life-saving intervention. There were no deaths among undertriaged patients.

CONCLUSION

The NEW simplified triage system significantly reduced the rate of overtriage, while safely maintaining a low undertriage rate.

摘要

背景

标准分诊系统导致过度分诊率较高,以实现可接受的低漏诊率。我们之前验证了最佳分诊变量,并在我院使用这些变量实施了一种新的简化分诊系统(NEW)。

方法

对2010年5月至2013年2月期间所有创伤病例进行前瞻性回顾。漏诊率和过度分诊率的计算基于是否需要任何紧急或挽救生命的干预措施。

结果

我们共识别出704例创伤患者。在新系统中,一级激活率从32%(旧系统)降至19%(P < 0.05)。新系统中的过度分诊率从79%(旧系统)降至44%(P < 0.01)。新系统的漏诊率为1.6%,而旧系统为1.2%(P = 无显著性差异)。所有患者中,14%(63例)需要进行挽救生命的干预。漏诊患者中无死亡病例。

结论

新的简化分诊系统显著降低了过度分诊率,同时安全地维持了低漏诊率。

相似文献

1
A simplified trauma triage system safely reduces overtriage and improves provider satisfaction: a prospective study.一项简化创伤分诊系统可安全减少过度分诊并提高医护人员满意度的前瞻性研究。
Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):856-62; discussion 862-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
2
A simplified set of trauma triage criteria to safely reduce overtriage: a prospective study.一套简化的创伤分诊标准以安全减少过度分诊:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Surg. 2009 Sep;144(9):853-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.153.
3
Using a multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to decrease undertriage and overtriage of pediatric trauma patients.采用多学科且基于证据的方法,以减少儿科创伤患者的分诊不足和过度分诊情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
Attempting to validate the overtriage/undertriage matrix at a Level I trauma center.试图在一级创伤中心验证过度分诊/分诊不足矩阵。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Dec;83(6):1173-1178. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001623.
5
Measuring trauma system performance: Right patient, right place-Mission accomplished?衡量创伤系统的绩效:合适的患者、合适的地点——任务完成了吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Aug;79(2):263-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000660.
6
Avoiding Cribari gridlock: The standardized triage assessment tool improves the accuracy of the Cribari matrix method in identifying potential overtriage and undertriage.避免克里巴里僵局:标准化分诊评估工具提高了克里巴里矩阵方法识别潜在过度分诊和分诊不足的准确性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 May;84(5):718-726. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001814.
7
Simple modification of trauma mechanism alarm criteria published for the TraumaNetwork DGU may significantly improve overtriage - a cross sectional study.创伤机制报警标准的简单修改可能会显著改善过度分诊——一项横断面研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 24;26(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0498-x.
8
Secondary overtriage: a consequence of an immature trauma system.二次过度分诊:不成熟创伤系统的一个后果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.285. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
9
Accuracy of the field triage protocol in selecting severely injured patients after high energy trauma.高能创伤后现场分诊方案在筛选重伤患者中的准确性。
Injury. 2014 May;45(5):869-73. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
10
A criteria-directed protocol for in-hospital triage of trauma patients.创伤患者院内分诊的基于标准的方案。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000397.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital referral versus clinical reality: evaluating prehospital trauma allocation with IVENA eHealth®.数字转诊与临床实际情况:使用IVENA eHealth®评估院前创伤分配
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Aug 22;51(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02949-w.
2
Criteria for trauma team activation and staffing requirements for the management of patients with (suspected) multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room- a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.复苏室中(疑似)多发伤和/或重伤患者管理的创伤团队启动标准及人员配备要求——系统评价与临床实践指南更新
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 18;51(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02817-7.
3
A Systematic Literature Review of Trauma Systems: An Operations Management Perspective.
创伤系统的系统文献综述:运营管理视角
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025 Jan 16;14:27536351241310645. doi: 10.1177/27536351241310645. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Impact of nonphysician, technology-guided alert level selection on rates of appropriate trauma triage in the United States: a before and after study.非医师主导的技术引导警报级别选择对美国适当创伤分诊率的影响:一项前后对照研究。
J Trauma Inj. 2023 Sep;36(3):231-241. doi: 10.20408/jti.2023.0020. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Effectiveness of a two-tiered trauma team activation system at a level I trauma center.在一级创伤中心实施双层创伤小组激活系统的效果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2265-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02644-2. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
6
[Analysis of a differentiated resuscitation room activation at a national trauma center].[国家创伤中心差异化复苏室启动情况分析]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;127(4):290-296. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01391-0. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
7
[Trauma team activation-Who should be alerted for which patients?].[创伤团队激活——哪些患者应提醒哪些人员?]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Jul;126(7):511-515. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01306-z. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
8
Failure to initiate trauma team activation for patients who meet the criteria in a level 1 paediatric trauma centre: which patients are missing out?未能为符合一级儿科创伤中心标准的患者启动创伤小组:哪些患者被遗漏了?
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2628-2634. doi: 10.1111/ans.17906. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
9
ISS alone, is not sufficient to correctly assign patients post hoc to trauma team requirement.ISS 单独使用不足以正确地将患者事后分配到创伤小组的需求。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):383-392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01410-4. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
Characteristics of scene trauma patients discharged within 24-hours of air medical transport.空中医疗转运后24小时内出院的现场创伤患者的特征
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Jan-Mar;10(1):25-31. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_75_19. Epub 2020 Mar 6.