• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a two-tiered trauma team activation system at a level I trauma center.在一级创伤中心实施双层创伤小组激活系统的效果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2265-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02644-2. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Attempting to validate the overtriage/undertriage matrix at a Level I trauma center.试图在一级创伤中心验证过度分诊/分诊不足矩阵。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Dec;83(6):1173-1178. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001623.
3
Using a multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to decrease undertriage and overtriage of pediatric trauma patients.采用多学科且基于证据的方法,以减少儿科创伤患者的分诊不足和过度分诊情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
Trauma team activation and triage of severely injured patients at one non-trauma-center hospital in Stockholm.斯德哥尔摩一家非创伤中心医院严重创伤患者的创伤小组激活和分诊。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 27;32(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01295-x.
5
Precision of field triage in patients brought to a trauma centre after introducing trauma team activation guidelines.引入创伤团队激活指南后,对送往创伤中心的患者进行现场分诊的精确性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Jan 9;17:1. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-1.
6
Evaluating the ability of a trauma team activation tool to identify severe injury: a multicentre cohort study.评估创伤团队激活工具识别严重损伤的能力:一项多中心队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 10;26(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0533-y.
7
Overtriage in trauma - what are the causes?创伤中的过度分诊——原因有哪些?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Oct;51(9):1178-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01414.x. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
8
Simple modification of trauma mechanism alarm criteria published for the TraumaNetwork DGU may significantly improve overtriage - a cross sectional study.创伤机制报警标准的简单修改可能会显著改善过度分诊——一项横断面研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 24;26(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0498-x.
9
Validation of the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage Score in Injured Pediatric Patients.验证小儿生理与解剖分诊评分在受伤小儿患者中的应用。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):363-369. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004552. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Efficacy of a two-tiered trauma team activation protocol in a Norwegian trauma centre.挪威创伤中心双层创伤小组激活方案的疗效。
Br J Surg. 2012 Feb;99(2):199-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7794. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.国家受伤患者现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2021 年的建议。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2):e49-e60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003627. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Need for Emergent Intervention within 6 Hours: A Novel Prediction Model for Hospital Trauma Triage.需要在 6 小时内进行紧急干预:一种新的医院创伤分诊预测模型。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Jul-Aug;26(4):556-565. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1958961. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
3
Accuracy of pre-hospital triage tools for major trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis and net clinical benefit.院前创伤分诊工具对严重创伤的准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析及净临床获益。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun 10;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00372-1.
4
Avoiding Cribari gridlock 2: The standardized triage assessment tool outperforms the Cribari matrix method in 38 adult and pediatric trauma centers.避免克里巴里僵局 2:标准化分诊评估工具在 38 家成人和儿科创伤中心的表现优于克里巴里矩阵方法。
Injury. 2021 Mar;52(3):443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Current trauma care system in Saudi Arabia: A scoping literature review.沙特阿拉伯当前的创伤急救体系:文献综述范围界定。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105653. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105653. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of trauma team activation protocol criteria in an Italian trauma center: A retrospective observational study.意大利一家创伤中心创伤团队启动方案标准的敏感性和特异性:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2019 May;44:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
7
Avoiding Cribari gridlock: The standardized triage assessment tool improves the accuracy of the Cribari matrix method in identifying potential overtriage and undertriage.避免克里巴里僵局:标准化分诊评估工具提高了克里巴里矩阵方法识别潜在过度分诊和分诊不足的准确性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 May;84(5):718-726. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001814.
8
Accuracy of prehospital triage protocols in selecting severely injured patients: A systematic review.院前分诊协议在筛选重伤患者中的准确性:一项系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Aug;83(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001516.
9
Trauma undertriage and overtriage rates: are we using the wrong formulas?创伤低检率和高检率:我们使用的公式有误吗?
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;34(11):2191-2192. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.061. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
A simplified trauma triage system safely reduces overtriage and improves provider satisfaction: a prospective study.一项简化创伤分诊系统可安全减少过度分诊并提高医护人员满意度的前瞻性研究。
Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):856-62; discussion 862-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

在一级创伤中心实施双层创伤小组激活系统的效果。

Effectiveness of a two-tiered trauma team activation system at a level I trauma center.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

Department of General Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben- Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2265-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02644-2. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02644-2
PMID:39196389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599413/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Many trauma patients who are transported to our level I trauma center have minor injuries that do not require full trauma team activation (FTTA). Thus, we implemented a two-tiered TTA system categorizing patients into red and yellow code alerts, indicating FTTA and Limited TTA (LTTA) requirements, respectively. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this triage tool by evaluating its diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), undertriage and overtriage) and comparing injury severity between the two groups.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a Level I trauma center. Characteristics compared between the red and yellow code groups included demographics, injury severity, treatments, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Calculating the diagnostic parameters was based on Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the need for life-saving surgery or procedures.

RESULTS

Significant differences in injury severity indicators were observed between the two groups. Patients in the red code group had a higher ISS and New Injury Severity Score (NISS), a lower Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and probability of survival. They had a longer hospital LOS, a higher Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rate and required more emergency operations. The Sensitivity of the triage tool was 85.2%, specificity was 55.6%, PPV was 74.2%, NPV was 71.5%, undertriage was 14.7%, and overtriage was 25.7%.

CONCLUSION

The two-tiered TTA system effectively distinguish between patients with major trauma who need FTTA and patients with minor trauma who can be managed by LTTA.

摘要

目的

许多被送往我们一级创伤中心的创伤患者只有轻微的损伤,不需要全面的创伤团队激活(FTTA)。因此,我们实施了一个两层的 TTA 系统,将患者分为红色和黄色代码警报,分别表示需要 FTTA 和有限 TTA(LTTA)。本研究旨在通过评估其诊断参数(敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、分诊不足和分诊过度)并比较两组之间的损伤严重程度来评估这种分诊工具的有效性。

方法

对一家一级创伤中心收治的患者进行回顾性队列研究。对红色和黄色代码组之间的特征进行比较,包括人口统计学特征、损伤严重程度、治疗和住院时间(LOS)。根据损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和是否需要救命手术或程序来计算诊断参数。

结果

两组间的损伤严重程度指标存在显著差异。红色代码组患者的 ISS 和新损伤严重程度评分(NISS)更高,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)和修订创伤评分(RTS)更低,生存率更高。他们的住院时间更长,重症监护病房(ICU)入院率更高,需要更多的急诊手术。分诊工具的敏感性为 85.2%,特异性为 55.6%,PPV 为 74.2%,NPV 为 71.5%,分诊不足为 14.7%,分诊过度为 25.7%。

结论

两层 TTA 系统能够有效区分需要 FTTA 的严重创伤患者和需要 LTTA 管理的轻度创伤患者。