Suppr超能文献

用于测量女性纤维肌痛患者身体活动和久坐时间的加速度计间比较:安达卢斯项目

Inter-accelerometer comparison to measure physical activity and sedentary time in female fibromyalgia patients: the al-Ándalus project.

作者信息

Camiletti-Moirón Daniel, Segura-Jiménez Víctor, Álvarez-Gallardo Inmaculada C, Estévez-López Fernando, Aparicio Virginia A, Carbonell-Baeza Ana, Ruiz Jonatan R, Delgado-Fernández Manuel

机构信息

Dept. of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, and Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Dept. of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Jan-Feb;33(1 Suppl 88):S46-52. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study was to compare physical activity (PA) levels and sedentary time between two accelerometers, the SenseWear Pro3 Armband (SWA) and the Actigraph GT1M, in Spanish female fibromyalgia patients.

METHODS

Patients wore the SWA and the Actigraph for 7 consecutive days. Total minutes/day spent in sedentary, light, moderate and moderate-to-vigorous PA were analysed. The agreement between the SWA and the Actigraph were assessed by using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Total PA, light, moderate, and moderate-vigorous PA levels in total-week, weekdays and weekends were higher (all, p ≤ 0.001), and sedentary time in total-week, weekdays and weekends lower (all, p<0.001) for the SWA when compared to the Actigraph. Concordance correlation coefficients between the SWA and the Actigraph ranged from 0.12 to 0.45 and Pearson's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.28 to 0.77. The Bland-Altman plots showed an overall lack of agreement between both methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the SWA and the Actigraph provide different estimates of PA and sedentary time in Spanish female fibromyalgia patients. Caution must be taken when using different devices and the location on the body must be noted. Our results suggest that the PA levels and sedentary time provided by both devices should be interpreted independently across studies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较西班牙女性纤维肌痛患者中,两种加速度计,即SenseWear Pro3臂带(SWA)和Actigraph GT1M之间的身体活动(PA)水平和久坐时间。

方法

患者连续7天佩戴SWA和Actigraph。分析每天久坐、轻度、中度和中等到剧烈PA所花费的总分钟数。使用Bland-Altman图评估SWA和Actigraph之间的一致性。

结果

与Actigraph相比,SWA在全周、工作日和周末的总PA、轻度、中度和中等到剧烈PA水平更高(均为p≤0.001),而在全周、工作日和周末的久坐时间更低(均为p<0.001)。SWA和Actigraph之间的一致性相关系数范围为0.12至0.45,Pearson相关系数范围为0.28至0.77。Bland-Altman图显示两种方法总体上缺乏一致性。

结论

本研究表明,SWA和Actigraph对西班牙女性纤维肌痛患者的PA和久坐时间提供了不同的估计值。使用不同设备时必须谨慎,并注意身体上的佩戴位置。我们的结果表明,两种设备提供的PA水平和久坐时间应在不同研究中独立解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验