Suppr超能文献

中文版:比较国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)与多传感器臂带加速度计在纤维肌痛女性中的应用:安达卢西亚项目。

Comparison of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with a multi-sensor armband accelerometer in women with fibromyalgia: the al-Ándalus project.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sports, School of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Nov-Dec;31(6 Suppl 79):S94-101. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare levels of physical activity (PA) assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with PA measured with the SenseWear Pro Armband (SWA) in women with fibromyalgia, and to assess the test-retest reliability of the IPAQ.

METHODS

The study comprised a total of 183 women with fibromyalgia aged 51.1±8.2 years. Participants wore the SWA for 9 consecutive days and filled in the IPAQ twice (separated by a 9-day interval). Total PA, time spent on moderate and vigorous intensity PA, and sitting time assessed by the IPAQ and the SWA (n=123) were compared.

RESULTS

Time spent on PA at different intensities (total, moderate and vigorous) was higher and sedentary time was lower when assessed by the IPAQ compared with the SWA (all p<0.001). Differences between the IPAQ and the SWA increased as the minutes per day in the IPAQ increased. The Bland-Altman plots showed no agreement between the IPAQ and the SWA. There was no association between the IPAQ and the SWA in any of the variables studied, except for walking domain from the IPAQ and moderate PA from the SWA (rp=0.19, p=0.03). Test-retest systematic differences were found for total PA score, moderate and vigorous intensity, working and domestic domains (all p<0.05). The ICCs for those domains without systematic differences (sitting, vehicle, walking, active transport time and leisure domains) ranged from 0.52 to 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The IPAQ differs from objectively measured PA and presents limitations to classify different categories of PA based on SWA data. Moreover, the IPAQ is not a reliable tool to assess PA in women with fibromyalgia.

摘要

目的

比较国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)评估的体力活动(PA)水平与 SenseWear Pro 臂带(SWA)测量的 PA 在纤维肌痛女性中的差异,并评估 IPAQ 的重测信度。

方法

本研究共纳入 183 名年龄为 51.1±8.2 岁的纤维肌痛女性。参与者佩戴 SWA 连续 9 天,并两次填写 IPAQ(间隔 9 天)。比较 IPAQ 和 SWA 评估的总 PA、中高强度 PA 时间、久坐时间。

结果

与 SWA 相比,IPAQ 评估的不同强度(总强度、中强度和高强度)PA 时间更高,久坐时间更低(均 p<0.001)。当 IPAQ 中的每天分钟数增加时,IPAQ 和 SWA 之间的差异增加。Bland-Altman 图显示 IPAQ 和 SWA 之间没有一致性。在研究的所有变量中,除了 IPAQ 的步行域和 SWA 的中强度 PA 外,IPAQ 和 SWA 之间没有相关性(rp=0.19,p=0.03)。总 PA 评分、中高强度、工作和家务领域存在 IPAQ 和 SWA 之间的测试重测系统差异(均 p<0.05)。无系统差异的那些领域(坐着、交通工具、步行、主动交通时间和休闲领域)的 ICC 范围为 0.52 至 0.71。

结论

IPAQ 与客观测量的 PA 不同,根据 SWA 数据对不同类别的 PA 进行分类存在局限性。此外,IPAQ 不是评估纤维肌痛女性 PA 的可靠工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验