Suppr超能文献

自我报告与加速度计测量的身体活动比较。

Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity.

机构信息

1Department of Education and Sport Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, NORWAY; and 2Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, NORWAY.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jan;46(1):99-106. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a0595f.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is one of the most widely used questionnaires to assess physical activity (PA). Validation studies for the IPAQ have been executed, but still there is a need for studies comparing absolute values between IPAQ and accelerometer in large population studies.

PURPOSE

To compare PA and sedentary time from the self-administered, short version of the IPAQ with data from ActiGraph accelerometer in a large national sample.

METHODS

A total of 1751 adults (19-84 yr) wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M) for seven consecutive days and completed the IPAQ-Short Form. Sedentary time, total PA, and time spent in moderate to vigorous activity were compared in relation to sex, age, and education.

RESULTS

Men and women reported, on average, 131 min·d (SE = 4 min·d) less sedentary time compared with the accelerometer measurements. The difference between self-reported and measured sedentary time and vigorous-intensity PA was greatest among men with a lower education level and for men 65 yr and older. Although men reported 47% more moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) compared with women, there were no differences between sexes in accelerometer-determined MVPA. Accelerometer-determined moderate PA was reduced from 110 to 42 min·d (62%) when analyzed in blocks of 10 min (P < 0.0001) compared with 1-min blocks. The main correlation coefficients between self-reported variables and accelerometer measures of physical activity were between 0.20 and 0.46.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants report through IPAQ-Short Form more vigorous PA and less sedentary time compared with the accelerometer. The difference between self-reported and accelerometer-measured MVPA increased with higher activity and intensity levels. Associations between the methods were affected by sex, age, and education, but not body mass index.

摘要

简介

国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)是评估体力活动(PA)最常用的问卷之一。已经进行了 IPAQ 的验证研究,但仍需要在大型人群研究中比较 IPAQ 和加速度计的绝对值。

目的

在一个大型的全国样本中,将自我管理的 IPAQ 短版与 ActiGraph 加速度计的数据进行比较,以比较 PA 和久坐时间。

方法

共有 1751 名成年人(19-84 岁)连续佩戴 ActiGraph GT1M 加速计 7 天,并完成 IPAQ-Short Form。比较了性别、年龄和教育程度与静坐时间、总 PA 和中高强度活动时间的关系。

结果

与加速度计测量相比,男性和女性平均报告的静坐时间分别少 131 分钟(SE=4 分钟)。自我报告和测量的静坐时间和剧烈强度 PA 之间的差异在教育程度较低的男性和 65 岁及以上的男性中最大。尽管男性报告的中度到剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)比女性多 47%,但在加速度计确定的 MVPA 方面,男女之间没有差异。当以 10 分钟为一个块(P<0.0001)进行分析时,与 1 分钟块相比,加速度计确定的中等 PA 减少了 110 分钟至 42 分钟(62%)。自我报告变量与加速度计测量的体力活动之间的主要相关系数在 0.20 到 0.46 之间。

结论

与加速度计相比,参与者通过 IPAQ-Short Form 报告更多的剧烈 PA 和更少的静坐时间。自我报告和加速度计测量的 MVPA 之间的差异随着活动和强度水平的增加而增加。方法之间的关联受到性别、年龄和教育程度的影响,但不受体重指数的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验