• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量改进计划的并行实施。

Concurrent implementation of quality improvement programs.

作者信息

Nyström Monica Elisabeth, Garvare Rickard, Westerlund Anna, Weinehall Lars

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, Medical Management Centre, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(3):190-208. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2012-0085.

DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2012-0085
PMID:25786184
Abstract

PURPOSE

Competing activities and projects can interfere with implementing new knowledge and approaches. The purpose, therefore, was to investigate processes and impact related to implementing two concurrent quality initiatives in a Swedish hospital. These were a regionally initiated, system-wide organizational learning programme called the Dynamic and Viable Organization (DVO) and a national initiative on stopping healthcare-associated and hospital-acquired infections (SHAI). Both undertakings aspired to increase staff competence in systematic improvement approaches.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Multiple methods were applied including surveys, observations, interviews, process diaries, documents and organizational measurements. Respondents were unit managers, change facilitators and improvement team members.

FINDINGS

Even though both initiatives shared the same improvement approach, there was no strong indication that they were strategically combined to benefit each other. The initiatives existed side by side with some coordination and some conflict. Despite absent management strategies to utilize the national SHAI initiative, positive developments in QI culture and communication were reported. The current study illustrates the inherent difficulties coordinating change initiatives, even in favourable circumstances.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This article addresses the lesser studied but common situation of coinciding and competing projects in organizations.

摘要

目的

相互竞争的活动和项目可能会干扰新知识和新方法的实施。因此,本研究旨在调查瑞典一家医院同时实施两项质量改进计划的过程及影响。这两项计划分别是一项由地区发起的全系统组织学习项目,称为动态与活力组织(DVO),以及一项全国性的预防医疗相关感染和医院获得性感染(SHAI)倡议。这两项工作都致力于提高员工在系统改进方法方面的能力。

设计/方法/途径:采用了多种方法,包括调查、观察、访谈、过程日记、文件和组织测量。受访者包括科室经理、变革促进者和改进团队成员。

研究结果

尽管两项计划采用了相同的改进方法,但没有有力证据表明它们在战略上相互结合以实现互利。这两项计划并存,有一定的协调,但也存在一些冲突。尽管缺乏利用全国性SHAI倡议的管理策略,但据报告在质量改进文化和沟通方面仍取得了积极进展。本研究表明,即使在有利的情况下,协调变革计划也存在内在困难。

原创性/价值:本文探讨了组织中同时存在且相互竞争的项目这种较少被研究但较为常见的情况。

相似文献

1
Concurrent implementation of quality improvement programs.质量改进计划的并行实施。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(3):190-208. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2012-0085.
2
Effects of organizational context on Lean implementation in five hospital systems.组织环境对五个医院系统中精益实施的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Apr-Jun;41(2):127-44. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000049.
3
Implementing quality initiatives in healthcare organizations: drivers and challenges.在医疗保健组织中实施质量改进措施:驱动因素与挑战
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(3):166-81. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2012-0047.
4
Implementing large-scale quality improvement: lessons from The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care.实施大规模质量改进:《高效病房:释放护理时间》的经验教训
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2012;25(4):237-53. doi: 10.1108/09526861211221464.
5
Lean Six Sigma implementation and organizational culture.精益六西格玛的实施与组织文化。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(8):855-63. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2015-0079.
6
Quality improvement training: experiences of frontline staff.质量改进培训:一线员工的经验
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(7):627-41. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2011-0056.
7
Implementing quality improvement through knowledge brokering: a Dutch case study.通过知识中介实现质量改进:一项荷兰案例研究。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2019 Jan 24;32(1):54-68. doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2017-0034. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Exploring the potential of a multi-level approach to improve capability for continuous organizational improvement and learning in a Swedish healthcare region.探索一种多层次方法在瑞典一个医疗保健区域提高持续组织改进和学习能力方面的潜力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 24;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3129-3.
9
Value-based healthcare as a trigger for improvement initiatives.基于价值的医疗保健作为改进举措的触发因素。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2017 Oct 2;30(4):364-377. doi: 10.1108/LHS-09-2016-0045. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Implementing an organization-wide quality improvement initiative: insights from project leads, managers, and frontline nurses.实施全组织范围的质量改进计划:来自项目负责人、管理人员和一线护士的见解。
Nurs Adm Q. 2013 Jul-Sep;37(3):222-30. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e318295ec9f.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing capability for continuous organisational improvement and learning in healthcare organisations: a systematic review of the literature 2013-2022.提升医疗组织持续组织改进和学习的能力:2013-2022 年文献系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 2;13(2):e002566. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002566.
2
Change in VA Community Living Centers 2004-2011: Shifting Long-Term Care to the Community.VA 社区生活中心 2004-2011 年的变化:将长期护理转向社区。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 Mar-Apr;30(2):93-108. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1414538. Epub 2018 Jan 8.