• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索一种多层次方法在瑞典一个医疗保健区域提高持续组织改进和学习能力方面的潜力。

Exploring the potential of a multi-level approach to improve capability for continuous organizational improvement and learning in a Swedish healthcare region.

作者信息

Nyström M E, Höög E, Garvare R, Andersson Bäck M, Terris D D, Hansson J

机构信息

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, SE 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 24;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3129-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3129-3
PMID:29793473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5968489/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eldercare and care of people with functional impairments is organized by the municipalities in Sweden. Improving care in these areas is complex, with multiple stakeholders and organizations. Appropriate strategies to develop capability for continuing organizational improvement and learning (COIL) are needed. The purpose of our study was to develop and pilot-test a flexible, multilevel approach for COIL capability building and to identify what it takes to achieve changes in key actors' approaches to COIL. The approach, named "Sustainable Improvement and Development through Strategic and Systematic Approaches" (SIDSSA), was applied through an action-research and action-learning intervention.

METHODS

The SIDSSA approach was tested in a regional research and development (R&D) unit, and in two municipalities handling care of the elderly and people with functional impairments. Our approach included a multilevel strategy, development loops of five flexible phases, and an action-learning loop. The approach was designed to support systems understanding, strategic focus, methodological practices, and change process knowledge - all of which required double-loop learning. Multiple qualitative methods, i.e., repeated interviews, process diaries, and documents, provided data for conventional content analyses.

RESULTS

The new approach was successfully tested on all cases and adopted and sustained by the R&D unit. Participants reported new insights and skills. The development loop facilitated a sense of coherence and control during uncertainty, improved planning and problem analysis, enhanced mapping of context and conditions, and supported problem-solving at both the individual and unit levels. The systems-level view and structured approach helped participants to explain, motivate, and implement change initiatives, especially after working more systematically with mapping, analyses, and goal setting.

CONCLUSIONS

An easily understood and generalizable model internalized by key organizational actors is an important step before more complex development models can be implemented. SIDSSA facilitated individual and group learning through action-learning and supported systems-level views and structured approaches across multiple organizational levels. Active involvement of diverse organizational functions and levels in the learning process was facilitated. However, the time frame was too short to fully test all aspects of the approach, specifically in reaching beyond the involved managers to front-line staff and patients.

摘要

背景

在瑞典,老年人护理和功能障碍者护理由各市镇负责组织。改善这些领域的护理工作十分复杂,涉及多个利益相关者和组织。需要制定适当的策略来培养持续组织改进和学习(COIL)的能力。我们研究的目的是开发并试点测试一种灵活的多层次方法来进行COIL能力建设,并确定实现关键行为者COIL方法转变所需的条件。该方法名为“通过战略和系统方法实现可持续改进与发展”(SIDSSA),通过行动研究和行动学习干预来应用。

方法

SIDSSA方法在一个区域研发(R&D)单位以及两个负责老年人和功能障碍者护理的市镇进行了测试。我们的方法包括多层次策略、五个灵活阶段的发展循环以及一个行动学习循环。该方法旨在支持系统理解、战略重点、方法实践和变革过程知识——所有这些都需要双环学习。多种定性方法,即重复访谈、过程日记和文件,为传统内容分析提供了数据。

结果

新方法在所有案例中均成功测试,并被研发单位采用和持续应用。参与者报告了新的见解和技能。发展循环在不确定性期间促进了连贯感和控制感,改善了规划和问题分析,增强了对背景和条件的映射,并支持了个人和单位层面的问题解决。系统层面的观点和结构化方法帮助参与者解释、推动和实施变革举措,尤其是在更系统地进行映射、分析和目标设定之后。

结论

在实施更复杂的发展模型之前,关键组织行为者内化一个易于理解且可推广的模型是重要的一步。SIDSSA通过行动学习促进了个人和团队学习,并支持了多个组织层面的系统层面观点和结构化方法。促进了不同组织职能和层面积极参与学习过程。然而时间框架太短,无法全面测试该方法的所有方面,特别是在涉及范围超越参与的管理人员至一线工作人员和患者方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5777/5968489/1fe85913f881/12913_2018_3129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5777/5968489/48e6b4992b72/12913_2018_3129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5777/5968489/1fe85913f881/12913_2018_3129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5777/5968489/48e6b4992b72/12913_2018_3129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5777/5968489/1fe85913f881/12913_2018_3129_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the potential of a multi-level approach to improve capability for continuous organizational improvement and learning in a Swedish healthcare region.探索一种多层次方法在瑞典一个医疗保健区域提高持续组织改进和学习能力方面的潜力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 24;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3129-3.
2
Rethinking capacity building for knowledge mobilisation: developing multilevel capabilities in healthcare organisations.重新思考知识转化的能力建设:培养医疗保健组织中的多层次能力。
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 15;9:166. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0166-0.
3
Quality as strategy, the evolution of co-production in the Region Jönköping health system, Sweden: a descriptive qualitative study.质量即策略:瑞典约恩奥普市卫生系统中共同生产的演变——一项描述性定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii15-ii22. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab060.
4
Characteristics of health care organizations associated with learning and development: lessons from a pilot study.与学习和发展相关的医疗保健组织的特征:一项试点研究的经验教训。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2009 Oct-Dec;18(4):285-94. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181bee19e.
5
Strategies to facilitate implementation and sustainability of large system transformations: a case study of a national program for improving quality of care for elderly people.促进大型系统变革实施与可持续性的策略:一项改善老年人护理质量国家项目的案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:401. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-401.
6
Quality improvement in large healthcare organizations.大型医疗保健机构的质量改进
J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):133-53. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2013-0209.
7
Analysing organisational context: case studies on the contribution of absorptive capacity theory to understanding inter-organisational variation in performance improvement.分析组织背景:吸收能力理论对理解组织间绩效改进差异的贡献的案例研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):48-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002928. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
8
Moving from theory to practice: experience of implementing a learning supporting model designed to increase patient involvement and autonomy in care.从理论到实践:实施旨在提高患者在护理中的参与度和自主性的学习支持模式的经验。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jul 23;9:361. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2165-5.
9
Enhancing capability for continuous organisational improvement and learning in healthcare organisations: a systematic review of the literature 2013-2022.提升医疗组织持续组织改进和学习的能力:2013-2022 年文献系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 2;13(2):e002566. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002566.
10
Developing research management and governance capacity in primary care organizations: transferable learning from a qualitative evaluation of UK pilot sites.提升基层医疗组织的研究管理与治理能力:来自英国试点地区定性评估的可借鉴经验
Fam Pract. 2004 Feb;21(1):92-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh120.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing capability for continuous organisational improvement and learning in healthcare organisations: a systematic review of the literature 2013-2022.提升医疗组织持续组织改进和学习的能力:2013-2022 年文献系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 2;13(2):e002566. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002566.
2
Decision-maker roles in healthcare quality improvement projects: a scoping review.决策者在医疗质量改进项目中的角色:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 4;13(1):e002522. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002522.
3
Looking Back, Looking Forward: A Study Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Multiple-Case Study to Examine Improvement Sustainability of Large-Scale Initiatives in Tertiary Hospitals.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing health care quality and safety through action learning.通过行动学习提升医疗保健质量与安全。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2017 May 2;30(2):148-158. doi: 10.1108/LHS-10-2016-0051.
2
Value-based healthcare measurement as a context for organizational learning.基于价值的医疗保健衡量作为组织学习的背景。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2017 May 2;30(2):159-170. doi: 10.1108/LHS-10-2016-0053.
3
Quality improvement in large healthcare organizations.大型医疗保健机构的质量改进
回顾与展望:一项混合方法多案例研究的研究方案,以检验三级医院大规模举措的改进可持续性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(15):2175. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152175.
4
Use and exchange of knowledge in the introduction of hospital-based home rehabilitation after a stroke: barriers and facilitators in change management.在引入基于医院的脑卒中后家庭康复中使用和交流知识:变革管理中的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07618-x.
5
Exploration on the gap of single- and double-loop learning of balanced scorecard and organizational performance in a health organization.健康组织中平衡计分卡单环与双环学习差距及组织绩效的探索
Heliyon. 2021 Dec 6;7(12):e08553. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08553. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Involvement of professionals in research: knowledge integration, development of practice, and challenges: a group concept mapping study.专业人员参与研究:知识整合、实践发展和挑战:一项群组概念图研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Aug 11;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00763-5.
7
Aiming for quality: a global compass for national learning systems.追求质量:国家学习体系的全球指南。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jul 19;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00746-6.
8
Contributions of the Simplified Competency Management Model to a Municipal Health Secretariat.简化能力管理模型对市级卫生部门的贡献。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jul 2;29:e3429. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3385.3429. eCollection 2021.
9
Sense-Making, Mutual Learning and Cognitive Shifts When Applying Systems Thinking in Public Health - Examples From Sweden Comment on "What Can Policy-Makers Get Out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners' Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health".系统思维在公共卫生中的应用:意义建构、相互学习和认知转变——来自瑞典的实例 述评:“政策制定者能从系统思维中得到什么?——政策伙伴对预防保健中系统聚焦的研究合作的体验”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Jun 1;10(6):338-342. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.106.
J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):133-53. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2013-0209.
4
Sustaining improvement? The 20-year Jönköping quality improvement program revisited.持续改进?重温延雪平20年质量改进计划。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Jan-Mar;24(1):21-37. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000048.
5
Strategies to facilitate implementation and sustainability of large system transformations: a case study of a national program for improving quality of care for elderly people.促进大型系统变革实施与可持续性的策略:一项改善老年人护理质量国家项目的案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:401. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-401.
6
Do reviews of healthcare interventions teach us how to improve healthcare systems?医疗干预措施的评价能教我们如何改进医疗体系吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Aug;114:129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.032. Epub 2014 May 27.
7
Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.应用计划-执行-研究-行动方法改善医疗保健质量的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
8
Organizational coherence in health care organizations: conceptual guidance to facilitate quality improvement and organizational change.医疗保健组织中的组织连贯性:促进质量改进和组织变革的概念指南。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2013 Apr-Jun;22(2):86-99. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31828bc37d.
9
Healthcare system intervention for prevention of birth injuries - process evaluation of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change.医疗保健系统干预以预防出生伤害 - 自我评估、同行评审、反馈和变更协议的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 24;12:274. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-274.
10
Perceived organizational problems in health care: a pilot test of the structured problem and success inventory.医疗保健中察觉到的组织问题:结构化问题与成功量表的初步测试
Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;21(2):93-103. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31824d18ff.