Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mov Disord. 2015 May;30(6):750-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.26206. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive disorder characterized by the emergence of motor deficits. In light of the voluminous and conflicting findings in the literature, the aim of the present quantitative review was to examine the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) in the treatment of motor signs in PD. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed using meta-analytic techniques and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) sections II and III were used as outcome measures. In order to determine the treatment effects of rTMS, the UPDRS II and III scores obtained at baseline, same day, to 1 day post rTMS treatment (short-term follow-up) and 1-month post stimulation (long-term follow-up) were compared between the active and sham rTMS groups. Additionally, the placebo effect was evaluated as the changes in UPDRS III scores in the sham rTMS groups. A placebo effect was not demonstrated, because sham rTMS did not improve motor signs as measured by UPDRS III. Compared with sham rTMS, active rTMS targeting the M1 significantly improved UPDRS III scores at the short-term follow-up (Cohen's d of 0.27, UPDRS III score improvement of 3.8 points). When the long-term follow-up UPDRS III scores were compared with baseline scores, the standardized effect size between active and sham rTMS did not reach significance. However, this translated into a significant nonstandardized 6.3-point improvement on the UPDRS III. No significant improvement in the UPDRS II was found. rTMS over the M1 may improve motor signs. Further studies are needed to provide a definite conclusion.
帕金森病(PD)是一种进行性疾病,其特征是运动功能障碍的出现。鉴于文献中大量且相互矛盾的发现,本定量综述的目的是检查针对初级运动皮层(M1)的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对 PD 运动症状的治疗效果。符合纳入标准的研究使用荟萃分析技术进行分析,统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)第二和第三部分被用作结局测量。为了确定 rTMS 的治疗效果,将基线、同天、rTMS 治疗后 1 天(短期随访)和刺激后 1 个月(长期随访)时的 UPDRS II 和 III 评分与主动 rTMS 和假刺激 rTMS 组进行比较。此外,还评估了假 rTMS 组中 UPDRS III 评分的安慰剂效应。由于假 rTMS 并未改善 UPDRS III 所测量的运动症状,因此并未显示出安慰剂效应。与假 rTMS 相比,针对 M1 的主动 rTMS 可显著改善短期随访时的 UPDRS III 评分(Cohen's d 为 0.27,UPDRS III 评分改善 3.8 分)。当将长期随访时的 UPDRS III 评分与基线评分进行比较时,主动 rTMS 和假 rTMS 之间的标准化效应大小没有达到显著性水平。然而,这转化为 UPDRS III 上显著的非标准化 6.3 点改善。未发现 UPDRS II 有显著改善。M1 上的 rTMS 可能改善运动症状。需要进一步的研究来提供明确的结论。