Suppr超能文献

髓内钉与钢板固定治疗肱骨干骨折:重叠荟萃分析的系统评价

Intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.

作者信息

Zhao Jia-Guo, Wang Jia, Wang Chen, Kan Shi-Lian

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin (J-GZ, JW); Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang City, Shenyang (CW); and Department of Hand Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China (S-LK).

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(11):e599. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000599.

Abstract

Multiple meta-analyses have been published to compare intramedullary nail and plate for treating humeral shaft fractures; however, results are discordant.The purposes of current study were to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing intramedullary nail and plate fixation for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures, to appraise the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of meta-analyses, and to propose a guide through the currently discordant available evidence.This systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. The literature was systematically reviewed to identify meta-analyses comparing intramedullary nail and plate fixation for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Only meta-analyses exclusively including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) met eligibility criteria in this systematic review. Methodological quality for each included study was assessed using the Oxford Levels of Evidence and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews Instrument. We extracted all variables from the included studies and listed the results reported by them. Heterogeneity information of each variable was extracted for the included studies. An I of <60% is accepted in this systematic review. The Jadad algorithm was then applied to determine which meta-analyses provided the best evidence.Seven studies met the inclusion criteria in this study. All studies included RCTs or quasi-RCT and were Level II of evidence. Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scores varied from 6 to 10 with a median of 7.86. Heterogeneity of each outcome was acceptable in those meta-analyses pooled results. The Jadad algorithm suggested that the meta-analyses can be selected based on the search strategies and application of selection. As a result, 2 meta-analyses with more RCTs were selected in this systematic review. The best available evidence suggested that the differences between intramedullary nail and plate fixation were not significant in fracture union, radial nerve injury, and infection. But intramedullary nail significantly increased the risk of shoulder complications (shoulder impingement and restriction of shoulder movement) and reoperation.We concluded that plate fixation is superior to intramedullary nail for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

摘要

已有多项荟萃分析发表,比较髓内钉与钢板治疗肱骨干骨折的疗效;然而,结果并不一致。本研究的目的是对比较髓内钉与钢板固定治疗肱骨干骨折的重叠荟萃分析进行系统评价,评估荟萃分析的方法学质量和报告质量,并在当前存在分歧的现有证据基础上提出指导意见。本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行。对文献进行系统回顾,以识别比较髓内钉与钢板固定治疗肱骨干骨折的荟萃分析。在本系统评价中,只有专门纳入随机临床试验(RCT)的荟萃分析符合纳入标准。使用牛津证据水平和多重系统评价评估工具对每项纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估。我们从纳入研究中提取了所有变量,并列出了它们报告的结果。提取了纳入研究中每个变量的异质性信息。本系统评价中异质性指数小于60%可接受。然后应用Jadad算法确定哪些荟萃分析提供了最佳证据。本研究中有7项研究符合纳入标准。所有研究均纳入了RCT或准RCT,证据等级为II级。多重系统评价得分在6至10分之间,中位数为7.86。在那些荟萃分析合并结果中,每个结局的异质性均可接受。Jadad算法表明,可根据检索策略和选择应用来选择荟萃分析。结果,在本系统评价中选择了2项纳入更多RCT的荟萃分析。现有最佳证据表明,髓内钉与钢板固定在骨折愈合、桡神经损伤和感染方面差异不显著。但髓内钉显著增加了肩部并发症(肩部撞击和肩部活动受限)和再次手术的风险。我们得出结论,对于肱骨干骨折的治疗,钢板固定优于髓内钉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f68/4602489/c10ae0c0f5b6/medi-94-e599-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验