Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3361-3368. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05491-3. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
This is a retrospective cohort study designed to compare short-term postoperative complication rates between closed humeral shaft fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus intramedullary nailing (IMN), as well as secondary independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried using CPT codes to identify patients that underwent an open reduction and plate fixation or intramedullary nailing procedure for a closed humeral shaft fracture from 2010 to 2021. Cohorts were matched using propensity scores to account for demographic differences and rates of complications were compared between the two groups.
From the database, a total of 4,222 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria, with 3,326 and 896 undergoing ORIF and IMN respectively. After propensity score matching, 866 of the nearest-neighbor matches were included in each cohort for a total of 1,732 patients in the final analysis. The rate of any adverse event (AAE) was significantly higher in the ORIF cohort (16.3%) than the IMN cohort (12.1%, p = 0.01). The ORIF group had higher rates of postoperative transfusion (p = 0.002), return to OR (p = 0.005), and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis, ASA class 4, increasing age, increasing operative time, and history of bleeding disorder were found to increase the risk of AAE in both ORIF and IMN patients.
While prior studies have claimed higher complication rates in IMN patients, this study found a significantly higher short-term risk of AAE in ORIF patients when compared in matched cohorts. However, individual 30-day complication rates do not differ significantly between procedures, and both have been shown to be safe and effective tools in the management of humeral shaft fractures.
这是一项回顾性队列研究,旨在比较切开复位内固定(ORIF)与髓内钉(IMN)治疗闭合肱骨干骨折的短期术后并发症发生率,并确定次要的独立不良预后危险因素。
使用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库中的 CPT 代码,对 2010 年至 2021 年间接受切开复位钢板固定或髓内钉治疗闭合肱骨干骨折的患者进行了检索。使用倾向评分匹配队列以考虑人口统计学差异,并比较两组之间的并发症发生率。
从数据库中总共确定了 4222 名符合纳入标准的患者,其中 3326 名和 896 名患者分别接受了 ORIF 和 IMN 治疗。在进行倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入了 866 名最近邻匹配者,最终分析共纳入了 1732 名患者。ORIF 组的任何不良事件(AAE)发生率(16.3%)明显高于 IMN 组(12.1%,p=0.01)。ORIF 组的术后输血(p=0.002)、再次手术(p=0.005)和手术部位感染(SSI,p=0.03)发生率更高。多变量分析显示,ASA 分级 4 级、年龄增加、手术时间延长和出血性疾病史均增加了 ORIF 和 IMN 患者 AAE 的风险。
尽管之前的研究声称 IMN 患者的并发症发生率更高,但与匹配队列相比,本研究发现 ORIF 患者的短期 AAE 风险显著更高。然而,两种手术方式的 30 天内并发症发生率没有显著差异,且两种手术方式均已被证明是治疗肱骨干骨折的安全有效的工具。