Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(1):202-7.
BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the changes in pain-related symptoms of inguinal hernias from initial admission to postoperative month 6 following 2 herniorrhaphy techniques.
Patients with unilateral inguinal hernias were scheduled for either Lichtenstein or self-gripping polypropylene mesh repair. Patients were preoperatively evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS) and a Turkish version ofthe Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire and the complaints related to pain were noted. After surgery, patients were discharged without early complications. Patients were reassessed at postoperative month 6. The late-term complaints of pain as well as neurological findings were evaluated using the VAS and the Turkish version of the DN4 questionnaire. Quality of life was also assessed with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP).
Thirty-four patients underwent conventional Lichtenstein repair and 19 patients underwent self-gripping polypropylene mesh repair. Even though decreases in VAS intensity scores for both hernia repair techniques were noted at postoperative month 6 when compared to the preoperative period, no significant changes were found in pain, VAS, total DN4, or NHP scores between groups.
Despite its ease of application and short time duration, self-gripping polypropylene mesh repair was not found to be superior to conventional Lichtenstein hernia repair in terms of reducing pain related to inguinal hernia.
背景/目的:比较两种疝修补术(Lichtenstein 修补术和自固定聚丙烯网塞修补术)治疗腹股沟疝后,患者疼痛相关症状从初始入院到术后第 6 个月的变化。
单侧腹股沟疝患者被安排接受 Lichtenstein 或自固定聚丙烯网塞修补术。患者在术前使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和土耳其版的神经病理性疼痛问卷 4(DN4)进行评估,并记录与疼痛相关的投诉。手术后,患者无早期并发症出院。术后第 6 个月对患者进行再次评估。使用 VAS 和土耳其版的 DN4 问卷评估晚期疼痛和神经学发现。使用诺丁汉健康调查问卷(NHP)评估生活质量。
34 例患者接受了传统的 Lichtenstein 修补术,19 例患者接受了自固定聚丙烯网塞修补术。与术前相比,两种疝修补技术在术后第 6 个月时 VAS 强度评分均有所下降,但组间疼痛、VAS、总 DN4 或 NHP 评分无显著差异。
尽管自固定聚丙烯网塞修补术易于操作且耗时较短,但与传统的 Lichtenstein 疝修补术相比,在减轻腹股沟疝相关疼痛方面并未显示出优势。