Bruna Esteban Marcos, Cantos Pallarés Miriam, Artigues Sánchez de Rojas Enrique, Vila María José
Hospital Valencia al Mar, Grupo NISA, Valencia, España; Hospital Aguas Vivas, Grupo NISA, Alzira, Valencia , España.
Hospital Valencia al Mar, Grupo NISA, Valencia, España; Hospital Aguas Vivas, Grupo NISA, Alzira, Valencia , España.
Cir Esp. 2014 Mar;92(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
The use of autoadhesive meshes with hooks that allow fixation without sutures is a therapeutic alternative to decrease recurrence and chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate if this kind of mesh has any advantage in long term results in comparison with the classic Lichtenstein technique with sutures and polypropylene mesh.
We report a prospective and randomized study of patients who have been operated on for inguinal hernia between march of 2009 to march 2010, divided into 2 groups of 45 patients. In AutoAdhesive (AA) group, we included patients operated on with an autoadhesive mesh and in Classic Lichtenstein (CL) group we included cases with an inguinal hernioplasty with sutured polypropylene mesh. We evaluated time of inactivity, complications, recurrences and grade of pain after one year.
The mean age was 60 years in AA group and 49 in LC group. There were more men than women and there were no differences in co-morbilities between groups. The mean size of hernia orifice was 3cm in both groups and 60% of the hernias were indirect. After one year, 77 patients were evaluated; 39 in LC group and 38 in AA group. 86,8% and 87,2% of them were asymptomatic. The mean time of recovery of daily activities was 15 days in both groups. There were neither recurrences nor severe chronic pain in the AA group. The mean of grade of pain was 0 (range:0-4) in AA group and 0 (range: 0-5) in LC group. In this group, there was one recurrence and one patient was taking analgesics for intense pain. No mortality nor other long term complications were found.
The use of autoadhesive and parcial reabsorbible meshes in inguinal hernia repair has no effect on recovery of daily activities, postoperative pain and long term complications compared with hernioplasty with polypropylene mesh fixed with monofilament suture.
使用带有倒刺的自粘性补片,无需缝合即可固定,是减少腹股沟疝修补术后复发和慢性疼痛的一种治疗选择。本研究的目的是评估与经典的使用缝线和聚丙烯补片的Lichtenstein技术相比,这种补片在长期效果上是否具有任何优势。
我们报告了一项前瞻性随机研究,研究对象为2009年3月至2010年3月间接受腹股沟疝手术的患者,分为两组,每组45例。自粘性(AA)组纳入使用自粘性补片进行手术的患者,经典Lichtenstein(CL)组纳入使用缝线固定聚丙烯补片进行腹股沟疝修补术的病例。我们评估了一年后的不活动时间、并发症、复发情况和疼痛程度。
AA组的平均年龄为60岁,LC组为49岁。男性多于女性,两组间合并症无差异。两组疝孔的平均大小均为3cm,60%的疝为间接疝。一年后,对77例患者进行了评估;LC组39例,AA组38例。其中86.8%和87.2%无症状。两组日常活动恢复的平均时间均为15天。AA组既无复发也无严重慢性疼痛。AA组疼痛程度的平均值为0(范围:0 - 4),LC组为0(范围:0 - 5)。该组有1例复发,1例患者因剧痛服用镇痛药。未发现死亡病例或其他长期并发症。
与使用单丝缝线固定聚丙烯补片的疝修补术相比,在腹股沟疝修补术中使用自粘性和部分可吸收补片对日常活动恢复、术后疼痛和长期并发症无影响。