Hülür Gizem, Gerstorf Denis
Institute of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Gerontology. 2015;61(3):218-22. doi: 10.1159/000371757. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Subjective memory complaints are often used as diagnostic criteria for several neurocognitive disorders. Although a number of studies have examined subjective memory and its associations with memory functioning in adulthood and old age, it is still an open question whether subjective perceptions of one's memory indicate actual memory functioning or whether they are rather derived from factors other than memory, such as depressive symptoms. The studies in this special section examine subjective perceptions of memory functioning and their associations with objectively measured memory performance in general and in clinical populations. The four articles adopt cross-sectional and longitudinal methodologies and offer key insights into the nature, correlates, and developmental trajectories of subjective memory. To begin with, the studies compiled in this special section demonstrate that changes in subjective memory perceptions are indeed associated with changes in memory performance [Zimprich and Kurtz, this issue, pp. 223-231], but the size of associations between levels of and changes in subjective memory and memory performance is in part modulated by personality characteristics and depressive symptoms [Hülür et al., this issue, pp. 232-240]. Second, the studies compiled here show that factors other than memory are also closely associated with memory perceptions, including functional health as well as domain-general and health-specific control beliefs [Luszcz et al., this issue, pp. 241-250]. Third, the study by Thompson et al. [this issue, pp. 251-257] shows that self- and informant-reports of retrospective and prospective memory difficulties are not associated with performance-based measures and does not sufficiently differentiate between healthy controls and patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. In our editorial, we put these findings in perspective and discuss implications for research and practice. To extend our knowledge, we conclude by outlining two key avenues for future research: (i) longitudinal multivariate studies of the construct space surrounding subjective memory and (ii) the viability of experience sampling studies with daily or hourly measurements to tackle some of the mechanisms underlying these associations.
主观记忆主诉常被用作多种神经认知障碍的诊断标准。尽管许多研究已探讨了主观记忆及其与成年期和老年期记忆功能的关联,但一个悬而未决的问题是,个体对自身记忆的主观认知是表明实际的记忆功能,还是更多地源自记忆以外的因素,比如抑郁症状。本专题中的研究考察了记忆功能的主观认知及其与一般人群和临床人群中客观测量的记忆表现之间的关联。这四篇文章采用了横断面研究和纵向研究方法,对主观记忆的本质、相关因素及其发展轨迹提供了关键见解。首先,本专题汇编的研究表明,主观记忆认知的变化确实与记忆表现的变化相关[津普里希和库尔茨,本期,第223 - 231页],但主观记忆水平与变化和记忆表现之间关联的大小部分受到人格特征和抑郁症状的调节[胡吕尔等人,本期,第232 - 240页]。其次,这里汇编的研究表明,除记忆之外的因素也与记忆认知密切相关,包括功能健康以及一般领域和健康特定的控制信念[卢施等人,本期,第241 - 250页]。第三,汤普森等人的研究[本期,第251 - 257页]表明,回顾性和前瞻性记忆困难的自我报告和知情者报告与基于表现的测量方法无关,且不能充分区分健康对照者与被诊断为轻度认知障碍或痴呆的患者。在我们的社论中,我们对这些发现进行了审视,并讨论了其对研究和实践的启示。为了拓展我们的知识,我们最后概述了未来研究的两条关键途径:(i) 对围绕主观记忆的构念空间进行纵向多变量研究;(ii) 采用每日或每小时测量的经验取样研究的可行性,以探究这些关联背后的一些机制。