Hülür Gizem, Hertzog Christopher, Pearman Ann M, Gerstorf Denis
Institute of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Gerontology. 2015;61(3):232-40. doi: 10.1159/000369010. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Aging researchers have long been interested in understanding individuals' subjective perceptions of their own memory functioning. Previous research has shown that subjective memory ratings are partly based on memory performance but also reflect the influence of other factors, such as depressive symptoms. The aim of the present study was to examine (1) longitudinal associations between trajectories of subjective memory and memory performance, (2) variables that predict levels of and changes in subjective memory and memory performance, and (3) variables that moderate associations between these constructs. We applied a latent growth curve model to four occasions of data from 15,824 participants of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; mean age at baseline=64.27 years, SD=9.90; 58% women). Results revealed that latent changes in subjective memory were correlated with latent changes in memory performance (φ=0.49), indicating that participants who reported steeper declines of subjective memory indeed showed steeper declines of memory performance over time. Three major patterns of associations emerged with respect to predictors of subjective memory and subjective memory change. First, the level of memory performance showed stronger associations with age, gender, and education, whereas subjective memory was more strongly associated with subjective age and personality traits. For example, women performed better than men on the episodic memory test, but there were no gender differences in subjective memory. Also, older age was associated with steeper declines of memory performance but with less decline of subjective memory. Second, personality traits that predicted subjective memory intercepts did not predict subjective memory slopes. Third, the strength of associations between levels and slopes of subjective memory and memory performance varied as a function of gender, education, depressive symptoms, and personality traits. Conscientiousness moderated the relationship of the level of subjective memory to the level of memory performance, consistent with the hypothesis that persons high in conscientiousness more accurately monitor memory successes and failures. The results reinforce the importance of depressive symptoms as a predictor of subjective memory but also indicate that a broader perspective on the reasons why memory complaints have modest correlations with memory itself is needed.
长期以来,衰老研究人员一直致力于了解个体对自身记忆功能的主观认知。先前的研究表明,主观记忆评分部分基于记忆表现,但也反映了其他因素的影响,如抑郁症状。本研究的目的是检验:(1)主观记忆轨迹与记忆表现之间的纵向关联;(2)预测主观记忆和记忆表现水平及变化的变量;(3)调节这些构念之间关联的变量。我们对来自健康与退休研究(HRS)的15824名参与者的四次数据应用了潜在增长曲线模型(基线平均年龄 = 64.27岁,标准差 = 9.90;58%为女性)。结果显示,主观记忆的潜在变化与记忆表现的潜在变化相关(φ = 0.49),这表明报告主观记忆下降更明显的参与者,其记忆表现随时间确实下降得更明显。关于主观记忆和主观记忆变化的预测因素,出现了三种主要的关联模式。首先,记忆表现水平与年龄、性别和教育程度的关联更强,而主观记忆与主观年龄和人格特质的关联更强。例如,女性在情景记忆测试中的表现优于男性,但在主观记忆方面不存在性别差异。此外,年龄较大与记忆表现下降更明显相关,但与主观记忆下降较少相关。其次,预测主观记忆截距的人格特质并不能预测主观记忆斜率。第三,主观记忆和记忆表现的水平与斜率之间的关联强度随性别、教育程度、抑郁症状和人格特质而变化。尽责性调节了主观记忆水平与记忆表现水平之间的关系,这与尽责性高的人能更准确地监测记忆成败的假设一致。这些结果强化了抑郁症状作为主观记忆预测因素的重要性,但也表明需要从更广泛的角度来理解记忆抱怨与记忆本身相关性较低的原因。