Traversi Deborah, Gorrasi Ilaria, Bonetta Sara, Leinardi Riccardo, Pietrangeli Biancamaria, Carraro Elisabetta, Gilli Giorgio
Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Environ Res. 2015 Apr;138:425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.035. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
The continued expansion of the green economy increases the risk profile for green occupational jobs. One of the broadest green sectors in terms of growth is the anaerobic digestion of biomasses. In recent years, this development has also interested Italian regions. The management of biomass includes biological risk and the risk of particulate and endotoxin exposure. In the present study, we evaluated airborne exposure for anaerobic digestion workers at two real-scale plants. Digested biomass has different origins, ranging from cattle sludge and manure to poultry manure to agricultural harvesting or processing residues, particularly from maize and fruits. Two sampling points were chosen: at the first, the input biomasses were stored, and the hopper was loaded; at the second, the digested sludge exited the digester. The microbiological parameters, assessed using an active sampler and cultural method, were the total bacteria counts (at 22, 37, and 55°C), yeasts, fungi, Pseudomonaceae, Clostridia spp., Enterobacteriaceae and Actinomycetes. Moreover, at the same sampling points, we evaluated six PM10 fraction levels (10.0-7.2, 7.2-3.0, 3.0-1.5, 1.5-0.95, 0.95-0.49, and <0.49µm) and the endotoxin content of each fraction. In this investigation, the microbe contamination of the air varied from low to high levels, while the PM10 and endotoxin levels were limited, reaching rural environmental levels (61.40µg/m(3) and 18.88EU/m(3), respectively). However, contamination and occupational risk must be evaluated individually for each plant because numerous variables influence the risk magnitude, particularly digested sludge treatments, such as input biomass nature, storage, movement conditions, building configuration and technological processes.
绿色经济的持续扩张增加了绿色职业工作的风险状况。就增长而言,最广泛的绿色领域之一是生物质的厌氧消化。近年来,这一发展也引起了意大利各地区的兴趣。生物质的管理包括生物风险以及接触颗粒物和内毒素的风险。在本研究中,我们评估了两家实际规模工厂中厌氧消化工人的空气暴露情况。消化后的生物质来源各异,从牛粪和粪便到家禽粪便,再到农业收获或加工残渣,特别是玉米和水果的残渣。选择了两个采样点:第一个采样点用于储存输入的生物质并装载料斗;第二个采样点用于消化后的污泥排出消化器。使用活性采样器和培养方法评估的微生物参数包括总细菌数(在22、37和55°C下)、酵母、真菌、假单胞菌科、梭菌属、肠杆菌科和放线菌。此外,在相同的采样点,我们评估了六个PM10粒径分级水平(10.0 - 7.2、7.2 - 3.0、3.0 - 1.5、1.5 - 0.95、0.95 - 0.49和<0.49μm)以及每个分级的内毒素含量。在本次调查中,空气的微生物污染程度从低到高不等,而PM10和内毒素水平有限,达到农村环境水平(分别为61.40μg/m³和18.88EU/m³)。然而,由于许多变量会影响风险程度,特别是消化污泥处理,如输入生物质的性质、储存、移动条件、建筑结构和工艺流程,因此必须针对每个工厂单独评估污染和职业风险。