Hondula David M, Davis Robert E, Saha Michael V, Wegner Carleigh R, Veazey Lindsay M
Center for Policy Informatics, School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA; School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Environ Res. 2015 Apr;138:439-52. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.033. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
Spatially targeted interventions may help protect the public when extreme heat occurs. Health outcome data are increasingly being used to map intra-urban variability in heat-health risks, but there has been little effort to compare patterns and risk factors between cities. We sought to identify places within large metropolitan areas where the mortality rate is highest on hot summer days and determine if characteristics of high-risk areas are consistent from one city to another. A Poisson regression model was adapted to quantify temperature-mortality relationships at the postal code scale based on 2.1 million records of daily all-cause mortality counts from seven U.S. cities. Multivariate spatial regression models were then used to determine the demographic and environmental variables most closely associated with intra-city variability in risk. Significant mortality increases on extreme heat days were confined to 12-44% of postal codes comprising each city. Places with greater risk had more developed land, young, elderly, and minority residents, and lower income and educational attainment, but the key explanatory variables varied from one city to another. Regression models accounted for 14-34% of the spatial variability in heat-related mortality. The results emphasize the need for public health plans for heat to be locally tailored and not assume that pre-identified vulnerability indicators are universally applicable. As known risk factors accounted for no more than one third of the spatial variability in heat-health outcomes, consideration of health outcome data is important in efforts to identify and protect residents of the places where the heat-related health risks are the highest.
在酷热天气出现时,空间定向干预措施可能有助于保护公众。健康结果数据越来越多地被用于绘制城市内部热健康风险的差异图,但在比较不同城市的模式和风险因素方面几乎没有做出努力。我们试图确定大都市区内热死率最高的地点,并确定高风险地区的特征在不同城市之间是否一致。基于美国七个城市210万条全因每日死亡率记录,采用泊松回归模型在邮政编码尺度上量化温度与死亡率的关系。然后使用多变量空间回归模型来确定与城市内部风险差异最密切相关的人口和环境变量。酷热天气下死亡率的显著增加仅限于每个城市12%至44%的邮政编码区域。风险较高的地区土地开发程度更高,有年轻、老年和少数族裔居民,且收入和教育水平较低,但关键解释变量因城市而异。回归模型解释了与热相关死亡率空间变异性的14%至34%。结果强调,热公共卫生计划需要因地制宜,不能假定预先确定的脆弱性指标普遍适用。由于已知风险因素在热健康结果的空间变异性中所占比例不超过三分之一,因此在识别和保护热相关健康风险最高地区的居民时,考虑健康结果数据非常重要。