Suppr超能文献

两种估算最大运动诱发电位50%的方法比较。

A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.

作者信息

Pitcher Julia B, Doeltgen Sebastian H, Goldsworthy Mitchell R, Schneider Luke A, Vallence Ann-Maree, Smith Ashleigh E, Semmler John G, McDonnell Michelle N, Ridding Michael C

机构信息

Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics & Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.

Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics & Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Dec;126(12):2337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Two commonly-used methods for setting stimulus intensities in transcranial magnetic brain stimulation studies were compared to determine which best approximated a motor evoked potential (MEP) of 50% of the maximal MEP amplitude (SI50); a suprathreshold intensity relative to resting motor threshold (rMT) or adjusting the intensity to evoke an MEP amplitude of 1mV.

METHODS

Corticomotor stimulus-response curves and rMT for the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of 176 subjects (aged 10-74 years) were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Regardless of subject age or sex, SI50 occurred at 127.5 ± 11.3% rMT. Except in young children, MEPs of 1 mV were significantly smaller than those evoked at SI50.

CONCLUSIONS

In the inactive FDI muscle, a stimulus intensity of 127-128% rMT consistently gives the best approximation of SI50 in most subjects, except perhaps young children.

SIGNIFICANCE

Setting TMS stimulus intensities relative to rMT provides a less variable inter-subject comparator, with respect to individual differences in corticomotor input-output characteristics, than adjusting the stimulator output to give an absolute MEP magnitude.

摘要

目的

比较经颅磁刺激研究中两种常用的刺激强度设置方法,以确定哪种方法最接近最大运动诱发电位(MEP)幅度50%的运动诱发电位(SI50);相对于静息运动阈值(rMT)的阈上强度,或调整强度以诱发1mV的MEP幅度。

方法

回顾性分析176名受试者(年龄10 - 74岁)右侧第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)的皮质运动刺激 - 反应曲线和rMT。

结果

无论受试者年龄或性别如何,SI50出现在127.5±11.3%的rMT处。除幼儿外,1mV的MEP明显小于在SI50时诱发的MEP。

结论

在不活动的FDI肌肉中,127 - 128%rMT的刺激强度在大多数受试者中始终能最好地接近SI50,幼儿可能除外。

意义

相对于根据个体皮质运动输入 - 输出特征的差异调整刺激器输出以获得绝对MEP幅度,相对于rMT设置经颅磁刺激(TMS)刺激强度提供了一个受试者间变异性较小的比较指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验