Laboratoire de Physiologie de l'Exercice, Université de Lyon, Saint-Etienne F-42023, France.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Mar 21;11:40. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-40.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely-used investigative technique in motor cortical evaluation. Recently, there has been a surge in TMS studies evaluating lower-limb fatigue. TMS intensity of 120-130% resting motor threshold (RMT) and 120% active motor threshold (AMT) and TMS intensity determined using stimulus-response curves during muscular contraction have been used in these studies. With the expansion of fatigue research in locomotion, the quadriceps femoris is increasingly of interest. It is important to select a stimulus intensity appropriate to evaluate the variables, including voluntary activation, being measured in this functionally important muscle group. This study assessed whether selected quadriceps TMS stimulus intensity determined by frequently employed methods is similar between methods and muscles.
Stimulus intensity in vastus lateralis, rectus femoris and vastus medialis muscles was determined by RMT, AMT (i.e. during brief voluntary contractions at 10% maximal voluntary force, MVC) and maximal motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude from stimulus-response curves during brief voluntary contractions at 10, 20 and 50% MVC at different stimulus intensities.
Stimulus intensity determined from a 10% MVC stimulus-response curve and at 120 and 130% RMT was higher than stimulus intensity at 120% AMT (lowest) and from a 50% MVC stimulus-response curve (p < 0.05). Stimulus intensity from a 20% MVC stimulus-response curve was similar to 120% RMT and 50% MVC stimulus-response curve. Mean stimulus intensity for stimulus-response curves at 10, 20 and 50% MVC corresponded to approximately 135, 115 and 100% RMT and 180, 155 and 130% AMT, respectively. Selected stimulus intensity was similar between muscles for all methods (p > 0.05).
Similar optimal stimulus intensity and maximal MEP amplitudes at 20 and 50% MVC and the minimal risk of residual fatigue at 20% MVC suggest that a 20% MVC stimulus-response curve is appropriate for determining TMS stimulus intensity in the quadriceps femoris. The higher selected stimulus intensities at 120-130% RMT have the potential to cause increased coactivation and discomfort and the lower stimulus intensity at 120% AMT may underestimate evoked responses. One muscle may also act as a surrogate in determining optimal quadriceps femoris stimulation intensity.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种广泛应用于运动皮质评估的研究技术。最近,使用 TMS 评估下肢疲劳的研究数量有所增加。这些研究中使用了 120-130%静息运动阈值(RMT)和 120%主动运动阈值(AMT)的 TMS 强度,以及在肌肉收缩过程中使用刺激反应曲线确定的 TMS 强度。随着运动中疲劳研究的扩展,股四头肌越来越受到关注。选择适当的刺激强度来评估变量非常重要,包括在这个功能重要的肌肉群中测量的自愿激活。本研究评估了通过常用方法确定的选定股四头肌 TMS 刺激强度在不同方法和肌肉之间是否相似。
通过 RMT、AMT(即在 10%最大自愿力的短暂自愿收缩期间)和在不同刺激强度下进行的短暂自愿收缩期间的刺激反应曲线中最大运动诱发电位(MEP)幅度,确定股直肌、股外侧肌和股中间肌的刺激强度。
来自 10%MVC 刺激反应曲线的刺激强度以及 120%和 130%RMT 的刺激强度高于来自 120%AMT(最低)和 50%MVC 刺激反应曲线的刺激强度(p<0.05)。来自 20%MVC 刺激反应曲线的刺激强度与 120%RMT 和 50%MVC 刺激反应曲线相似。来自 10%、20%和 50%MVC 的刺激反应曲线的平均刺激强度分别对应于大约 135%、115%和 100%RMT 和 180%、155%和 130%AMT。对于所有方法,所选刺激强度在肌肉之间相似(p>0.05)。
在 20%和 50%MVC 时相似的最佳刺激强度和最大 MEP 幅度以及在 20%MVC 时最小的残余疲劳风险表明,20%MVC 刺激反应曲线适合确定股四头肌的 TMS 刺激强度。在 120-130%RMT 时选择较高的刺激强度可能会增加共激活和不适,而在 120%AMT 时选择较低的刺激强度可能会低估诱发反应。一种肌肉也可以作为确定最佳股四头肌刺激强度的替代物。