Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Applied Statistics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 26;65(20):2159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
Obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist. Weight loss reduces the burden of AF, but whether this is sustained, has a dose effect, or is influenced by weight fluctuation is unknown.
This study sought to evaluate the long-term impact of weight loss and weight fluctuation on rhythm control in obese individuals with AF.
Of 1,415 consecutive patients with AF, 825 had a body mass index ≥ 27 kg/m(2) and were offered weight management. After screening for exclusion criteria, 355 were included in this analysis. Weight loss was categorized as group 1 (≥ 10%), group 2 (3% to 9%), and group 3 (<3%). Weight trend and/or fluctuation was determined by yearly follow-up. We determined the impact on the AF severity scale and 7-day ambulatory monitoring.
There were no differences in baseline characteristics or follow-up among the groups. AF burden and symptom severity decreased more in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001 for all). Arrhythmia-free survival with and without rhythm control strategies was greatest in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001 for both). In multivariate analyses, weight loss and weight fluctuation were independent predictors of outcomes (p < 0.001 for both). Weight loss ≥ 10% resulted in a 6-fold (95% confidence interval: 3.4 to 10.3; p < 0.001) greater probability of arrhythmia-free survival compared with the other 2 groups. Weight fluctuation >5% partially offset this benefit, with a 2-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 4.3; p = 0.02) increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence.
Long-term sustained weight loss is associated with significant reduction of AF burden and maintenance of sinus rhythm. (Long-Term Effect of Goal directed weight management on Atrial Fibrillation Cohort: A 5 Year follow-up study [LEGACY Study]; ACTRN12614001123639).
肥胖症和心房颤动(AF)经常同时存在。减轻体重可降低 AF 的负担,但这种减轻是否可持续、是否存在剂量效应、或是否受体重波动影响尚不清楚。
本研究旨在评估肥胖合并 AF 患者体重减轻和体重波动对节律控制的长期影响。
在 1415 例连续的 AF 患者中,825 例 BMI≥27kg/m²并接受了体重管理。经过排除标准筛选后,355 例患者纳入本分析。体重减轻分为三组:组 1(≥10%)、组 2(3%至 9%)和组 3(<3%)。通过每年随访确定体重趋势和/或波动。我们评估了对 AF 严重程度评分和 7 天动态监测的影响。
各组间基线特征和随访无差异。与组 2 和 3 相比,组 1 的 AF 负担和症状严重程度下降更多(所有 p<0.001)。与组 2 和 3 相比,组 1 无论是否采用节律控制策略,心律失常无复发生存时间最长(两者均为 p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,体重减轻和体重波动是结局的独立预测因素(两者均为 p<0.001)。与其他两组相比,体重减轻≥10%可使心律失常无复发生存的可能性增加 6 倍(95%置信区间:3.4 至 10.3;p<0.001)。体重波动>5%部分抵消了这一益处,心律失常复发风险增加 2 倍(95%置信区间:1.0 至 4.3;p=0.02)。
长期持续的体重减轻与 AF 负担的显著降低和窦性节律的维持相关。(目标导向的体重管理对心房颤动队列的长期影响:一项 5 年随访研究[LEGACY 研究];ACTRN12614001123639)。